From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DC7A0562; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:54:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B126A1C05C; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:54:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BEF1C031 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:54:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940905C0136; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:54:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:54:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=B4SgCqjUIoMbRcK0AJtG0ja0U5SvZWMFHTb/K47jCng=; b=Pa2lUTNKJisM 516OWkRoaJUsmUOaUSU7CE6gBauPjzWteRpiof0QJncUPYzWKAb60WC/Z2zTkXzo azGFJYPkQOtZ4vxK+0qF3681WiH9o7MehbInBch+FzS1rbmefFeyMEwdqk9psxRS G4demcacnGCACUIamns1QkERqjJRZ6o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=B4SgCqjUIoMbRcK0AJtG0ja0U5SvZWMFHTb/K47jC ng=; b=fYxTWTMqVd3Qai3fgTz33+FB5fE7+FoYU3fpyIQxTgChxrfp2fJtE2cMh /c0gvpno5TkwR0rqmhFwpdRrV5wpjdLe+SU7Uaxtj/YSZWIpQcDDwaqWmr/5jwrE WrZxjtUqIht/eJ+J24DbWX9uGE8eJPlSsZopTXPv+dN00XOQLE/txgH2PLX/ny6x DpUEDYxdZoQrOMJdfOrGAy10o36eA7ufDEtrShuOXyvBJCCtPwDnCPAZtHJRIAnl b7IiMlVGHz7ybt4LfOobMBbP30ma9d77VQ2c2chbK94nYctKGtmgSRCUhouHUwsm LvjmHU+MqJ/OBGTu1IEnuSaEM7VmQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudeiiedghedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B564B306CA80; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:54:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Vijaya Mohan Guvva Cc: dev@dpdk.org, fiona.trahe@intel.com, Ferruh Yigit Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:54:34 +0200 Message-ID: <2216574.9XhxPE3A7Q@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1583452940-346826-1-git-send-email-vijay1054@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: pcidev access from secondary process X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 06/03/2020 13:28, Ferruh Yigit: > On 3/6/2020 12:02 AM, Vijaya Mohan Guvva wrote: > > For pci devices presented through igb_uio, pcidev->mem_resource[] is > > not populated when the device is initialized for secondary process. > > > > Initialize pcidev->mem_resource[] with pci-bar mapped addresses. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vijaya Mohan Guvva > > Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit Do you mean secondary process never worked with igb_uio? Or is there a specific case? What is the root cause? Should it be backported to stable?