From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
olivier.matz@6wind.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, viacheslavo@nvidia.com,
ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: move pool pointer in first half
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:44:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2232904.O0RIXgeV2Y@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C6140F@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
10/11/2020 11:05, Morten Brørup:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 10:30 PM
> >
> > According to the Technical Board decision
> > (http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-November/191859.html),
> > the mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> > from the second to the first half.
> > It may increase performance in some cases
> > on systems having 64-byte cache line, i.e. mbuf split in two cache
> > lines.
> >
> > Due to this change, tx_offload is moved.
>
> A minor correction: All fields after m->pool are moved up 8 bytes, not only m->tx_offload.
Yes I will improve the message before merging, thanks.
>
> > Hopefully no vector data path is impacted.
> >
> > Moving this field gives more space to dynfield1
> > while dropping the temporary dynfield0.
> >
> > This is how the mbuf layout looks like (pahole-style):
> >
> > word type name byte size
> > 0 void * buf_addr; /* 0 + 8
> > */
> > 1 rte_iova_t buf_iova /* 8 + 8
> > */
> > /* --- RTE_MARKER64 rearm_data;
> > */
> > 2 uint16_t data_off; /* 16 + 2
> > */
> > uint16_t refcnt; /* 18 + 2
> > */
> > uint16_t nb_segs; /* 20 + 2
> > */
> > uint16_t port; /* 22 + 2
> > */
> > 3 uint64_t ol_flags; /* 24 + 8
> > */
> > /* --- RTE_MARKER rx_descriptor_fields1;
> > */
> > 4 uint32_t union packet_type; /* 32 + 4
> > */
> > uint32_t pkt_len; /* 36 + 4
> > */
> > 5 uint16_t data_len; /* 40 + 2
> > */
> > uint16_t vlan_tci; /* 42 + 2
> > */
> > 5.5 uint64_t union hash; /* 44 + 8
> > */
> > 6.5 uint16_t vlan_tci_outer; /* 52 + 2
> > */
> > uint16_t buf_len; /* 54 + 2
> > */
> > 7 struct rte_mempool * pool; /* 56 + 8
> > */
> > /* --- RTE_MARKER cacheline1;
> > */
> > 8 struct rte_mbuf * next; /* 64 + 8
> > */
> > 9 uint64_t union tx_offload; /* 72 + 8
> > */
> > 10 struct rte_mbuf_ext_shared_info * shinfo; /* 80 + 8
> > */
> > 11 uint16_t priv_size; /* 88 + 2
> > */
> > uint16_t timesync; /* 90 + 2
> > */
> > 11.5 uint32_t dynfield1[9]; /* 92 + 36
> > */
> > 16 /* --- END 128
> > */
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>
> The minor detail doesn’t prevent...
>
> Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-07 15:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] " Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-07 17:12 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-07 18:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-07 19:05 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-07 20:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 5:18 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 8:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 8:27 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 9:47 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-09 12:01 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 12:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 13:35 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 14:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 14:08 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 14:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 14:53 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 8:16 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-09 10:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] " Bruce Richardson
2020-11-09 10:21 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-09 18:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-11-10 7:15 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-07 18:57 ` [dpdk-dev] " Morten Brørup
2020-11-09 10:08 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-09 10:30 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-09 10:33 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-11-09 10:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-09 11:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-11-09 21:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] move mbuf pool pointer Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-09 21:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] drivers: disable OCTEON TX2 in 32-bit build Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-10 18:05 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-09 21:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: move pool pointer in first half Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-10 10:05 ` Morten Brørup
2020-11-10 10:44 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-11-10 16:25 ` Olivier Matz
2020-11-10 18:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-12 14:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-10 18:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2232904.O0RIXgeV2Y@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).