DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Renata Saiakhova <Renata.Saiakhova@ekinops.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] drivers/net: Fix in e1000 and ixgbe HW rings memory overlap
Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 12:59:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22376860.ouqheUzb2q@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1694bc99-39ee-35b7-c316-dd2f00a73069@intel.com>

05/05/2020 12:28, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 03-May-20 5:26 PM, Renata Saiakhova wrote:
> > Delete memzones for HW rings in igb and ixgbe while freeing queues
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Renata Saiakhova <Renata.Saiakhova@ekinops.com>
> > ---
> 
> +Thomas
> 
> Should this perhaps be fixed in all drivers, not just ixgbe/igb? Is this 
> safe to do in multiprocess? I'm not too well versed in ethdev mechanics 
> when it comes to multiprocess, presumably the application itself is 
> responsible for synchronizing access to ports, so freeing the resources 
> should be OK?

The application is responsible of port policy.
If the application decides to close a port,
it must be safe in all threads and processes,
meaning it is application responsibility to not refer to port resources.

About fixing in all drivers, is it something missing in other drivers?



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-05 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-03 16:26 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Memory corruption due to HW rings allocation Renata Saiakhova
2020-05-03 16:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] librte_ethdev: Introduce a function to release HW rings Renata Saiakhova
2020-05-05 10:25   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-05-05 10:45     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-05-05 12:49       ` Renata Saiakhova
2020-05-05 13:36         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-05-05 15:47   ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-05 17:25     ` Renata Saiakhova
2020-05-05 17:31       ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-05-06 10:14       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-05-03 16:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] drivers/net: Fix in e1000 and ixgbe HW rings memory overlap Renata Saiakhova
2020-05-05 10:28   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-05-05 10:59     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-05-05 11:36       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-05-05 11:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Memory corruption due to HW rings allocation Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-05 11:19   ` Renata Saiakhova
2020-05-05 12:35     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22376860.ouqheUzb2q@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=Renata.Saiakhova@ekinops.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).