From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6411B168 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:17:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF2F20BC4; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 03:17:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Jan 2018 03:17:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ad+jk2nQr44VP1N2vxaV0g9SdL H95MbUWplvMjf09Us=; b=A7QckFiyeJ1EM3l71ZlmZSfyHfeZmSA+TswwZMFpTk pZiOEvQNihWYdIqqW+LkV6THonqTarkP+7/CrhJPuXKH0UOU+r3PrRnAln5uc3Pb gfIvMUF2Tnq4iXjprbeu4H6tSVSL/Hbu4/Nwz5DgvyJNuNILJroKbVkxJwkSDZ5B M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ad+jk2 nQr44VP1N2vxaV0g9SdLH95MbUWplvMjf09Us=; b=lPVGRanyZLYSPr89rvn5b5 B10PT0psgm6UR9jHE/kbrQ4OBNSprXV9D3ckEcIyCxVhRSRYjb0gPO/ts+S5Oldi /zfQmSZezPuguJHT9eT9SoiYBORWIvyizD3ar813lytwjnjeXI0w2QW5tfN1rymM DHThOpoMEAN5cDtcs4p2UVNrRAQU9ZLcS11p1z+iW+Abse/7ZeSSIVaD3DnFpFid lNlsIhrCGJTJFGD2rADFCYkLfA3Al/NZo1HECD7NEGaJWzfnd8MkGIuvLM6/4ATj 2oe5SBe0krYGjAZOEaWmgLlBJ9Mt93R1v/iqw2EelzdFYXSlPzPw7no9ymPwpz7g == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 755E57E351; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 03:17:18 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Neil Horman , "Iremonger, Bernard" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Yigit, Ferruh" Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 09:17:01 +0100 Message-ID: <2264748.ymP9TsbnYi@xps> In-Reply-To: <20180102122138.GA8096@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> References: <20171128221302.15400-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C24E06EEA4@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <20180102122138.GA8096@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] ethdev: remove useless parameter in callback process X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 08:17:19 -0000 02/01/2018 13:21, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:35:02AM +0000, Iremonger, Bernard wrote: > > > int _rte_eth_dev_callback_process(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, > > > - enum rte_eth_event_type event, void *cb_arg, void *ret_param); > > > + enum rte_eth_event_type event, void *ret_param); > > > > As this is a change to the public API of librte_ether is a deprecation notice needed ? > > This API is currently used by the test/test/virtual_pmd.c APP and may be used by other APP's in the field. > > > Agreed, it definately should go through the deprecation process This function is used by drivers only, that's why there is an underscore at the beginning of its name. So it is not part of the regular ABI and does not need any deprecation notice, in my opinion.