From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68B71BB91 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:44:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6CDD8E; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:44:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:44:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=uOYFqXeU9s8Oc13+N5gvwoEg/4FWgIX5Fg5XYpiuV+Y=; b=ANkHFQauamrD aVXpIHwMN8L/Y3cxtcWt/kVmjswvYVw4UNoWBa1z56zbT0T7syN3zHnwUdtw4oGg fxWq8qaANXSik0D7Kve/1MdDhpXwNB4yWrkMp+MdO9FwxsYr6uUAHkzgOU9Ki9BW YbP/fxJUZiDtZoCebnW5I3Q7IMsADRs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=uOYFqXeU9s8Oc13+N5gvwoEg/4FWgIX5Fg5XYpiuV +Y=; b=WYGK+HeeIi5F+Vfpq688VH0apbKwHFUpSRzVqSQZWYxHa+erLrMCwEJ7K L4NLIC32vlL37fOiZZgUiA9rY2wNfOmB3ezCRizx8YbfRuRc0U6KJ5g7Sun/iLPe v4+cgtzogSWwwyC74cs9nf0VXNc9aMJahgl8oRCpOWgkLNvBVOXYYNd13gtGYtcC VJQn3lqIO7aypbANDqKRobS55gAEJFaMqhNFTh0V/u20XocfQqe0EUI5k/QY94o8 veLROxnzKFY/LsE/kxzYeMnXm6fI7+cFkiT0e8fbO4tExy/ilCjVJipyuxYam7aq SSXldfjjXvTqDl6F3f4m0i9bgm6+Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedrudeigedguddvgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecu fedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufffkf gjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhn uceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukh drohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DDA4D10086; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:44:26 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Wang, Xiao W" Cc: Maxime Coquelin , "alejandro.lucero@netronome.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Wang, Zhihong" , "Ye, Xiaolong" , "Bie, Tiwei" Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:44:25 +0100 Message-ID: <2266493.k8d6OFhNvQ@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20181213100910.13087-2-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> <0391f85a-4fcf-a84d-df6a-47d354a793ba@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/10] vhost: provide helpers for virtio ring relay X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:44:32 -0000 18/12/2018 09:27, Wang, Xiao W: > From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com] > > On 12/17/18 3:41 PM, Wang, Xiao W wrote: > > > Thanks for the confirmation. > > > > Please note that CI reports a checkpatch issue: > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/48935/ > > + Thomas. > > I've tried the checkpatch.pl from CentOS 7.4 & 7.5 and also from the latest kernel, get no warning in my > self-check with dpdk/devtools/checkpatches.sh. > I don't know what checkpatch.pl the CI uses, it depends on the DPDK_CHECKPATCH_PATH environment > variable setting. In the v5 patch, I add the __rte_experimental flag for the new API even in the vdpa.c file, > but CI still reports this warning. It required to be updated on dpdk.org. It should be fixed now.