From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Vamsi Attunuru" <vattunuru@marvell.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Cc: fengchengwen@huawei.com, kevin.laatz@intel.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
anoobj@marvell.com, Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: announce dmadev new capability addition
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:24:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22665936.hxa6pUQ8Du@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1ORvP51OgM1Hgks39nHG-rqYYV3M5_gu=NfYE-4CAfCsg@mail.gmail.com>
29/07/2024 17:20, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 6:19 PM Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > Announce addition of new capability flag and fields in
>
> The new capability flag won't break ABI. We can mention only fields
> update rte_dma_info and rte_dma_conf structures.
>
> Another option is new set APIs for priority enablement. The downside
> is more code. All, opinions?
>
> > rte_dma_info and rte_dma_conf structures.
I'm fine with just updating these structs.
> > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Any other opinions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 12:49 Vamsi Attunuru
2024-07-29 15:20 ` Jerin Jacob
2024-07-29 17:17 ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-31 10:24 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2024-07-30 12:10 ` [PATCH v2] doc: announce changes to dma device structures Amit Prakash Shukla
2024-07-30 12:53 ` [PATCH v3] " Amit Prakash Shukla
2024-07-30 14:46 ` [PATCH v4] " Amit Prakash Shukla
2024-07-30 17:27 ` Jerin Jacob
2024-07-31 11:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-31 16:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22665936.hxa6pUQ8Du@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=vattunuru@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).