From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A772E41 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:24:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id d128so27379210wmf.1 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 06:24:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vRkTk4CQ6RdhwQg736lU/GLVwNJ5tWNbQQXUQKTE/qA=; b=ld1B/g2Tb9kER8ZZqnFLHgTf7fXqQoIj4R/imefkCJSbw3OX2xcZ5Q0NGF6qNn4bDA N6G6AzY7LfSHFCGrUcY2ucMYI8MXQ7FptRKCNzwifEuRZj1nd+yy3eRByXU/596bS2Cq r29vbb3bj5Bip3xf5yQlKUPEI1t6dL3QoOo7dhRBxYctyBPtGHchaZGh4YXrUHBBkxHa FhVIUtgQB5r4VL4I+e3ZOkWDvyrukSqCpXwYPUBXZgaXuQGWiysDGPDfXAOD4hFbMIB2 cphaXVUYduply01PxpdTrYIMMDR3Y9dNxYBTJFCwRY9qzgd0CaRcmY+viMhxOGBvnJbI IQmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vRkTk4CQ6RdhwQg736lU/GLVwNJ5tWNbQQXUQKTE/qA=; b=AkBMEBUTHIOIygSllLdUFNw4tertqTKbMWQqCxzIYSHSMbBszLrwT10PmgZ8brnpL+ euF4JBH8A1KW0O9RK24BY6Fn81+vYojj1iW4l+IpuFcOejTzTnCRVesFlz/PbSDM+ijx upzygmvsxy92gLdetw93LrfxByS9Shmb6TXEQwtsthjmLelKpj8/zyTZs54YehmDZIhQ zIsi7BcuSwGXml8AkFEARwFbWOD2rd6CNSZarKrIzZeiPA6qw9GvyC0n4WH3FkB8b6qe sqjcZul0sj6u1HHb4eDG5ijki1ZTClNvYQR8VZX+VF10mfm5Tf05l4ckLwnb0rMmSLeo 611A== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfp82F25GeJifRRX8WoRzgBKB28+G6QSADyCw0q9ODilFYzAzznM5xRkacfXXMPhRDm X-Received: by 10.28.138.209 with SMTP id m200mr3032332wmd.89.1477401861093; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 06:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k74sm3675626wmd.18.2016.10.25.06.24.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 06:24:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Ramia, Kannan Babu" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Olivier Matz , Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Wiles, Keith" Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:24:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2277634.HujMj1Cctl@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5wj6euqlvai26vmpn4dcfe4p.1477400683290@email.android.com> References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC359EA8B1@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <39b70924-0e66-478c-36ea-dd18d27ed8a6@6wind.com> <5wj6euqlvai26vmpn4dcfe4p.1477400683290@email.android.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:24:21 -0000 2016-10-25 13:04, Ramia, Kannan Babu: > Port filed is important meta information for the application use like > CGNAT vEPC functions etc. > I strongly recommend to keep the field in mind meta. Have you tried to move this field outside of the mbuf? What is the performance degradation? We need more information than some assumptions.