DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] app/testpmd: add ipv6 extension header parse
@ 2025-01-08  2:46 Jie Hai
  2025-01-08 17:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jie Hai @ 2025-01-08  2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit, Aman Singh
  Cc: lihuisong, fengcengwen, haijie1, huangdengdui

This patch support parse ipv6 extension header, and
support TSO for ipv6tcp packets with extension header.

Signed-off-by: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
---
 app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
index 2246c22e8e56..a7b11490fe27 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
@@ -124,14 +124,59 @@ parse_ipv4(struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, struct testpmd_offload_info *info)
 		info->l4_len = 0;
 }
 
+static uint16_t
+parse_ipv6_ext(struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, uint32_t *off)
+{
+	struct ext_hdr {
+		uint8_t next_hdr;
+		uint8_t len;
+	};
+	struct ext_hdr *xh;
+	uint16_t proto;
+	char *xh_fst;
+	uint16_t i;
+
+	proto = ipv6_hdr->proto;
+	xh_fst = (char *)ipv6_hdr + sizeof(*ipv6_hdr);
+#define MAX_EXT_HDRS 9
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_EXT_HDRS; i++) {
+		switch (proto) {
+		case IPPROTO_HOPOPTS:
+		case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
+		case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
+			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
+			*off += (xh->len + 1) * 8;
+			proto = xh->next_hdr;
+			break;
+		case IPPROTO_AH:
+			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
+			*off += (xh->len + 2) * 4;
+			proto = xh->next_hdr;
+			break;
+		case IPPROTO_FRAGMENT:
+			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
+			*off += 8;
+			proto = xh->next_hdr;
+			return proto; /* this is always the last ext hdr */
+		case IPPROTO_NONE:
+			return proto;
+		default:
+			return proto;
+		}
+	}
+	return proto;
+}
+
 /* Parse an IPv6 header to fill l3_len, l4_len, and l4_proto */
 static void
 parse_ipv6(struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, struct testpmd_offload_info *info)
 {
 	struct rte_tcp_hdr *tcp_hdr;
+	uint32_t off = 0;
 
 	info->l3_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr);
-	info->l4_proto = ipv6_hdr->proto;
+	info->l4_proto = parse_ipv6_ext(ipv6_hdr, &off);
+	info->l3_len += off;
 
 	/* only fill l4_len for TCP, it's useful for TSO */
 	if (info->l4_proto == IPPROTO_TCP) {
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add ipv6 extension header parse
  2025-01-08  2:46 [PATCH] app/testpmd: add ipv6 extension header parse Jie Hai
@ 2025-01-08 17:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
  2025-01-14  2:05   ` Jie Hai
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2025-01-08 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jie Hai
  Cc: dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit, Aman Singh, lihuisong, fengcengwen,
	huangdengdui

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:46:32 +0800
Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com> wrote:

> From: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
> To: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>, Aman Singh  <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
> CC: <lihuisong@huawei.com>, <fengcengwen@huawei.com>, <haijie1@huawei.com>,  <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add ipv6 extension header parse
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:46:32 +0800
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0
> 
> This patch support parse ipv6 extension header, and
> support TSO for ipv6tcp packets with extension header.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> index 2246c22e8e56..a7b11490fe27 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> @@ -124,14 +124,59 @@ parse_ipv4(struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, struct testpmd_offload_info *info)
>  		info->l4_len = 0;
>  }
>  
> +static uint16_t
> +parse_ipv6_ext(struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, uint32_t *off)
> +{
> +	struct ext_hdr {
> +		uint8_t next_hdr;
> +		uint8_t len;
> +	};
> +	struct ext_hdr *xh;
> +	uint16_t proto;
> +	char *xh_fst;
> +	uint16_t i;
> +
> +	proto = ipv6_hdr->proto;
> +	xh_fst = (char *)ipv6_hdr + sizeof(*ipv6_hdr);
> +#define MAX_EXT_HDRS 9
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_EXT_HDRS; i++) {
> +		switch (proto) {
> +		case IPPROTO_HOPOPTS:
> +		case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
> +		case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
> +			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
> +			*off += (xh->len + 1) * 8;
> +			proto = xh->next_hdr;
> +			break;
> +		case IPPROTO_AH:
> +			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
> +			*off += (xh->len + 2) * 4;
> +			proto = xh->next_hdr;
> +			break;
> +		case IPPROTO_FRAGMENT:
> +			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
> +			*off += 8;
> +			proto = xh->next_hdr;
> +			return proto; /* this is always the last ext hdr */
> +		case IPPROTO_NONE:
> +			return proto;
> +		default:
> +			return proto;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return proto;
> +}
> +

Why copy/paste of rte_net_skip_ip6_ext, why not use that?
Having two copies of same codes means that bugs need to be fixed in two places later.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add ipv6 extension header parse
  2025-01-08 17:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2025-01-14  2:05   ` Jie Hai
  2025-01-14 11:24     ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jie Hai @ 2025-01-14  2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Hemminger
  Cc: dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit, Aman Singh, lihuisong, fengcengwen,
	huangdengdui

Hi, Stephen Hemminger,

On 2025/1/9 1:02, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:46:32 +0800
> Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
>> To: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>, Aman Singh  <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
>> CC: <lihuisong@huawei.com>, <fengcengwen@huawei.com>, <haijie1@huawei.com>,  <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add ipv6 extension header parse
>> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:46:32 +0800
>> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0
>>
>> This patch support parse ipv6 extension header, and
>> support TSO for ipv6tcp packets with extension header.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
>> index 2246c22e8e56..a7b11490fe27 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
>> @@ -124,14 +124,59 @@ parse_ipv4(struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, struct testpmd_offload_info *info)
>>   		info->l4_len = 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static uint16_t
>> +parse_ipv6_ext(struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, uint32_t *off)
>> +{
>> +	struct ext_hdr {
>> +		uint8_t next_hdr;
>> +		uint8_t len;
>> +	};
>> +	struct ext_hdr *xh;
>> +	uint16_t proto;
>> +	char *xh_fst;
>> +	uint16_t i;
>> +
>> +	proto = ipv6_hdr->proto;
>> +	xh_fst = (char *)ipv6_hdr + sizeof(*ipv6_hdr);
>> +#define MAX_EXT_HDRS 9
>> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_EXT_HDRS; i++) {
>> +		switch (proto) {
>> +		case IPPROTO_HOPOPTS:
>> +		case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
>> +		case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
>> +			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
>> +			*off += (xh->len + 1) * 8;
>> +			proto = xh->next_hdr;
>> +			break;
>> +		case IPPROTO_AH:
>> +			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
>> +			*off += (xh->len + 2) * 4;
>> +			proto = xh->next_hdr;
>> +			break;
>> +		case IPPROTO_FRAGMENT:
>> +			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
>> +			*off += 8;
>> +			proto = xh->next_hdr;
>> +			return proto; /* this is always the last ext hdr */
>> +		case IPPROTO_NONE:
>> +			return proto;
>> +		default:
>> +			return proto;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	return proto;
>> +}
>> +
> 
> Why copy/paste of rte_net_skip_ip6_ext, why not use that?
> Having two copies of same codes means that bugs need to be fixed in two places later.
> .
Thanks for your review.

rte_net_skip_ip6_ext uses mbuf as a parameter, but its upper-layer
function does not pass this parameter, and it is difficult to deduce the
mbuf address. It would also be strange to pass only the mbuf address and
not use it.

My idea is to replace the packet identification in csum fwd with
'rte_net_get_ptype()'. In this case, 'rte_net_get_ptype' needs to be 
updated to adapt to the packet types supported by csum fwd. This may
affect the ptype of packets identified by the current software.
I'm not sure how big the impact is, which is why I didn't use it.

Maybe I can send it out later for review.

Thanks,
Jie Hai


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add ipv6 extension header parse
  2025-01-14  2:05   ` Jie Hai
@ 2025-01-14 11:24     ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2025-01-14 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Hemminger, Jie Hai
  Cc: dev, ferruh.yigit, Aman Singh, lihuisong, fengcengwen, huangdengdui

14/01/2025 03:05, Jie Hai:
> Hi, Stephen Hemminger,
> 
> On 2025/1/9 1:02, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:46:32 +0800
> > Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> From: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
> >> To: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>, Aman Singh  <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
> >> CC: <lihuisong@huawei.com>, <fengcengwen@huawei.com>, <haijie1@huawei.com>,  <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add ipv6 extension header parse
> >> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:46:32 +0800
> >> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0
> >>
> >> This patch support parse ipv6 extension header, and
> >> support TSO for ipv6tcp packets with extension header.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >>   app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>   1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> >> index 2246c22e8e56..a7b11490fe27 100644
> >> --- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> >> +++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
> >> @@ -124,14 +124,59 @@ parse_ipv4(struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, struct testpmd_offload_info *info)
> >>   		info->l4_len = 0;
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> +static uint16_t
> >> +parse_ipv6_ext(struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr, uint32_t *off)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct ext_hdr {
> >> +		uint8_t next_hdr;
> >> +		uint8_t len;
> >> +	};
> >> +	struct ext_hdr *xh;
> >> +	uint16_t proto;
> >> +	char *xh_fst;
> >> +	uint16_t i;
> >> +
> >> +	proto = ipv6_hdr->proto;
> >> +	xh_fst = (char *)ipv6_hdr + sizeof(*ipv6_hdr);
> >> +#define MAX_EXT_HDRS 9
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_EXT_HDRS; i++) {
> >> +		switch (proto) {
> >> +		case IPPROTO_HOPOPTS:
> >> +		case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
> >> +		case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
> >> +			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
> >> +			*off += (xh->len + 1) * 8;
> >> +			proto = xh->next_hdr;
> >> +			break;
> >> +		case IPPROTO_AH:
> >> +			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
> >> +			*off += (xh->len + 2) * 4;
> >> +			proto = xh->next_hdr;
> >> +			break;
> >> +		case IPPROTO_FRAGMENT:
> >> +			xh = (struct ext_hdr *)(xh_fst + *off);
> >> +			*off += 8;
> >> +			proto = xh->next_hdr;
> >> +			return proto; /* this is always the last ext hdr */
> >> +		case IPPROTO_NONE:
> >> +			return proto;
> >> +		default:
> >> +			return proto;
> >> +		}
> >> +	}
> >> +	return proto;
> >> +}
> >> +
> > 
> > Why copy/paste of rte_net_skip_ip6_ext, why not use that?
> > Having two copies of same codes means that bugs need to be fixed in two places later.
> > .
> Thanks for your review.
> 
> rte_net_skip_ip6_ext uses mbuf as a parameter, but its upper-layer
> function does not pass this parameter, and it is difficult to deduce the
> mbuf address. It would also be strange to pass only the mbuf address and
> not use it.
> 
> My idea is to replace the packet identification in csum fwd with
> 'rte_net_get_ptype()'. In this case, 'rte_net_get_ptype' needs to be 
> updated to adapt to the packet types supported by csum fwd. This may
> affect the ptype of packets identified by the current software.
> I'm not sure how big the impact is, which is why I didn't use it.
> 
> Maybe I can send it out later for review.

The only thing I'm sure is that testpmd is a test application,
so it should reuse the functions from the libs.
It should not reinvent new functions for network parsing.

If you need to add a new function to the library, please do it.
You can probably move the content of rte_net_skip_ip6_ext()
in a new function in the file lib/net/rte_ip6.h.
Something similar to rte_ipv6_get_next_ext().



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-14 11:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-08  2:46 [PATCH] app/testpmd: add ipv6 extension header parse Jie Hai
2025-01-08 17:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-14  2:05   ` Jie Hai
2025-01-14 11:24     ` Thomas Monjalon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).