From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90885A0C47; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:54:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1AD410E0; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:54:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006C44067C; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADE15C0164; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:54:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:54:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= AjARD9bjf5/eQX7cOprGyeP3RwdjK8Z3EBKTrYfkEH0=; b=Ih4GwWl1aDhkP+rT Z+9XvUbJ2CdB7HP6nJ+/vo/UmUi9ojyOu1vbmtV9OJ4vBFbMkvRImCmyXxRhW1fw fGWerxPX5uEYw0e/1WY1n1Q/J42e33hm6kCSy76oiVEakDx+Fh41UsR9w094GLjj 89I4q4oi9O1Smp9+dcYzIGx4BPRKu0kXpHMnFBEz0cmSia88rEgW9vVclBJTx5T4 +feJAzied2ZHGUnkgrygA93RF4y0hSlU+6gawOxHOkUzQqQ9Hkbt9PGA9aAqj+9p /evRrasWxFtJIOFueDLCM1jxa+Orp3E0VUeHHvq7yhgxLuCZKaKObwXog63Zbv+X ghzgLg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=AjARD9bjf5/eQX7cOprGyeP3RwdjK8Z3EBKTrYfkE H0=; b=mVGi3BrDCvAeYGVSYXrkF92VSJxzo1uEO5aaVUJIG/KWK6fQZlxil1+Br ueBVjgvbdDW8FX/hXShxZ9Sxe1wd4uo7c1bCKq2ck+LJ/1o7pJJ9nk0E6RwBTJU1 Q/EVV5/L7X2x17DS3+GdjXeZq/ZC28Pafe+JIjetMyJLuQD6jYlGbs+kjYXCqd9c yDyhvePkbgYaBIYhAEscOW3u3GxENILaltTD8qej/Kn1ERhKHqaZU3+zbqy6+ra0 Btw7+T+gqbGc7onGr2W7OgM9vdLBvY5esu0sjXSS6O/cBgUZnDRdPEKyzjDWzx46 AigCgt9AasbLJN6BYhZXGi4eCtv9g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddtjedgudduudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:54:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Lincoln Lavoie Cc: Dmitry Kozlyuk , dev , ci@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:54:44 +0200 Message-ID: <2281202.uAlgbfQCXe@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210921081632.858873-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> <2132581.gUyNG9Hos0@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v6 0/3] eal: add memory pre-allocation from existing files X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 11/10/2021 23:12, Lincoln Lavoie: > Hi All, > > I'm assuming this should be added to the "checkpatch" job / report? I think yes. > Correct, or do folks feel this should be a separate run / report? Please what are the tests already run in this job? I may suggest more. > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:52 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 11/10/2021 10:56, Dmitry Kozlyuk: > > > v6: fix copyright line (Thomas), add SPDX header for the new test file > > > (BTW, why didn't the CI complain in previous versions?) > > > > Probably because the CI doesn't run the script devtools/check-spdx-tag.sh > > Cc ci@dpdk.org to add this test.