From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3485593
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:59:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C3D211E1;
 Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:59:56 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=xYpor7LB2TP8L5GSb8w/kR3QBe
 LgP/yehf0Q5jaItDc=; b=WDeerMglUI4DBa6KyF9p8UJrVkQtlUgAFU0CbxSaZF
 ldEyzuX207NwoXyAuOsOc0/HD04kuTezInmB2RoqxPHvtLE/jUc/t9KO4ouyZ+ws
 UGWK1fq9mb1KVTwx4uEBqlmkQYdwVo7/6tD34ynbF+sjOefKKRiIwXuGBm5/TULc
 A=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=xYpor7
 LB2TP8L5GSb8w/kR3QBeLgP/yehf0Q5jaItDc=; b=W1krWVkvPgco+buyPUn+2b
 i84zpvyB3ZXQSasRfFrKoOTlR7hPshG5mXvgtOUSWMN+eM1qJNLpgAWEi3EfJZpK
 vVwAfGJX3aH3Bn++iqE912qPoD6LrYBBXvJK2dipQQTrU2q8joEbt17sVmKb3QtD
 kGtPeRHPVbobLssqI87TyCxwpzrPoM7KmBti1jxgrvrMmhatOZ81wGyORACJ0nJT
 MgMbAbWMUiPSciccQq3Qu8N2/drfwCEw24DCPH28IBOTZNA0pOVY205Xu65ldgNe
 kiVa/nQU7k5aKz8AS9h2PIkIr6yqGuc/UY5b3XCW0hXtKDdEp7ouueZuHr5zwC2Q
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:zKizWoPoLVM2leo3oPmgxyIdUGX-LO1Sc2zqJO6AkPVyuYVY0TkWTw>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 639E47E1A2;
 Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:59:55 +0100
Message-ID: <2293021.YCkHM76IOx@xps>
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258A0AB30B1@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061153171181@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258A0AB30B1@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question for queue_start
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:59:57 -0000

22/03/2018 13:27, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> Hi Qi, 
> 
> 
> >Hi:
> >       In rte_eth_dev_rx|tx_queue_start, dev_started is not checked
> >         
> >      Which mean we can call  
> >         Rte_eth_rx_queue_setup
> >         Rte_eth_rx_qeueu_start         
> >
> >         And what we expected is the queue is started while device is still stopped, does this make sense?
> >         Should it return fail when device is not started?
> 
> Good point, I think we should.

Yes, I think there was no intent to start a queue of a stopped device.