From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com (mail-we0-f174.google.com
 [74.125.82.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E7E5424
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:00:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x3so1605587wes.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:00:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=RztlxD5yXXX/1VonEyj0hVR/wuHYT7injrSFxp2qCTo=;
 b=F34UtytsKmo++6AL4yXDBj+OUR43SXhH26B7uiIEVLH+W6+Gd2fFmqzfDF43jeaDdg
 CSiCX4Rq41F0O4fOL4C9oOXHgj2/6EutIvp3lArPr+nWIn1wUnNnpsbaii2dx9k6gthJ
 OUkvC0xwFXBJx3lLMy4SO/Vf33/cakkfK/pCyFsHPG/1pcvUfVs0/hTmibmUoJxFkMZt
 ncdwoEUuU4BZYjBSvF4WlxlRvmzL/vANZ2pvZIs9RQegBrkLrfsz4mtsRcJovzEnh6Rg
 L/PeAUQIh8eGr8UhZ0T586ST0nWizyQ7v7HpbdCvGYp4cAVCQDm81Dk/UIZ6XlAfwuIG
 PyNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnYXBLDyBOSD87FGTOSI721zgTZH8QgvYCLzlooDgsSxZCFjth9/FRDklytx1XtzE5/hURb
X-Received: by 10.181.27.199 with SMTP id ji7mr5062101wid.76.1421931623859;
 Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:00:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net.
 [82.239.227.177])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uq1sm3897364wjc.14.2015.01.22.05.00.22
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:00:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:00:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Original-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:00 +0100
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Chi, Xiaobo (NSN - CN/Hangzhou)" <xiaobo.chi@nsn.com>
Message-ID: <2296434.5EpfcH711R@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.18.2-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20150122111732.GA4580@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1417601518-16852-1-git-send-email-xiaobo.chi@nsn.com>
 <EF703E8970265941A1316EEFE0AA7B6C40A92F4B@SGSIMBX004.nsn-intra.net>
 <20150122111732.GA4580@bricha3-MOBL3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add one option memory-only for secondary
	processes
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:00:24 -0000

2015-01-22 11:17, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:05:34AM +0000, Chi, Xiaobo (NSN - CN/Hangz=
hou) wrote:
> > Hi, Bruce,
> > Since the DPDK2.0 merge window is opened now, so is it possible for=
 this patch to be one candidate for v2.0?
> > I searched in the DPDK patchwork(http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/=
project/dpdk/list/?state=3D*&q=3Dmemory-only&archive=3Dboth ), but can =
not find this V2 patch. Can you please help to check why? Thanks a lot.=

> >=20
> > Filters: Search =3D memory-only  remove filter
> > Patch=09 Date=09Submitter=09Delegate=09State
> > [dpdk-dev] add one option memory-only for those secondary PRBs=0920=
14-12-02=09chixiaobo=09=09Not Applicable
> > [dpdk-dev] add one option memory-only for those secondary PRBs=0920=
14-12-02=09chixiaobo=09=09Changes Requested
> >=20
> > Brgs,
> > Chi Xiaobo
> >=20
> That's a question that Thomas is better able to answer than me, since=
 he is the
> man with control over patchwork! :-)
>=20
> Thomas, any feedback here?

I have no log for this kind of problem.
But I know that patchwork ignores emails with special characters.
And in your commit log, there are some in "mechanism and it?=EF=BF=BD=EF=
=BF=BDs upper libs".
Moreover, this commit log should be wrapped.
A quick look shows also that some spaces/tabs are missing.
It was a v2 and there is no change log.
Please submit a v3 after cleaning.

I didn't review this patch and nobody gave its Acked-by.
So at the moment, it's pending. I'll try to review v3 carefully.
Other comments are welcome. I feel this patch can break some important =
things.
Which tests have you done? (it could be described in commit log)

Last point: I don't like the current implementation of secondary proces=
s
and Ericsson wanted to discuss their own implementation:
=09http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-December/009796.html

--=20
Thomas