From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6862AA00C5; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 10:26:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F3F40146; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 10:26:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B040C400D4 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 10:26:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from dggpeml500024.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NbDkn3g4BzHqPX; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:22:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.100.224] (10.67.100.224) by dggpeml500024.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:26:24 +0800 Subject: Re: NIC support for IOVA as VA To: =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=c3=b8rup?= , References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87562@smartserver.smartshare.dk> From: fengchengwen Message-ID: <22b08bb1-c525-0fb5-9b0f-9ae6a10767a4@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:26:24 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87562@smartserver.smartshare.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.100.224] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpeml500024.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.10) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Morten, +1 for features. Also this is a compilation option. Can you add compilation and related test cases to the DPDK CI? In this way, we can check whether the patch affects the code(IOVA_AS_PA). On 2022/12/7 16:06, Morten Brørup wrote: > Should support for IOVA as VA be listed under NIC features [1]? > > [1]: http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ > > > Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards, > -Morten Brørup > > > > . >