From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F15D5593
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  8 Jun 2018 21:34:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA08A21CA1;
 Fri,  8 Jun 2018 15:34:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Jun 2018 15:34:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=qQKEgTl5mt1+QikIC4FMh4AJlk
 SrWs9oTD/fO4xGZDA=; b=G09PFJlO21P6Cd0xquRoHG7VzmgdOD6KEQqvK3ytJl
 2nyqC5PikwuCzyMYngPsQZhr22DJl8VKEoFkkiR+a6Dq0LMr4Qo8vf0/LlD6u7uu
 Pb/2gSJmpI/sMh3Bs85IvRWA5QEcgsrI6hdY2WzUWvGJIF2WAJ2JShx+K1dP6K8s
 g=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=qQKEgT
 l5mt1+QikIC4FMh4AJlkSrWs9oTD/fO4xGZDA=; b=OrVd4q+UAElaR+uLJUF2kn
 FBpPj865tdHPZoLxfAzNLmEk8nyImgB/RcBWbi/Nv/5VZRVMmyfa4aBVsjE/28vp
 eCmU8qjNg4xpVraltKpdpDaMkZu/gbwHlle3xrruhi//to0mHhXQfvpR39veNTOG
 VHbO6Eh4Yd0DV2Gv0aIqL7A27QHEI8VJkBpuhJgiJxLWCUXWospr+CTevtAnjSNS
 8d4QLUDwOgHd1J+3Fm3tAtQyXT1SXgG9UQsnqbExi2cLAKT0Z7RUiUymVgwD5UPR
 QasIslG+pUqFIItrlhXcGc4yN5rYED8RepX0FMt6E1vTVKV8CWKBZNMj2sbs3ZWw
 ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:TdoaW76deKFysUMuSfNGUt_9-ZTpRMTbn8k19F1pXLfZyOLBH7tyPQ>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:TdoaW1xtrgCnBAdGJfAIq4fKBYFRm09xTgAJJmCNdFzDLkEaw9MmSw>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:TdoaW4XO_hhP-IfiXUBJLrUP2W-i9dqnZexr0zw7rUr19FtEjw6WZw>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:TdoaW-kyQg7YQw-PwlcINSHLrQGoUry2OICOvU7qBQ5wAXt6rAXN9A>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:TdoaW1Na7UkRn1K5lzbRoK8WZ_cEA8oGnO_dtnbHVe6wbiGah_8e4w>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:TdoaW61ar26NDPU2_ujn2OV67Lbn8i5xQjfUA7tGZfMOCvw7AkkhNg>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:TdoaW5Hhg8s2vZmq2nyOKx_b5uFRb9oxBG-9MQiDW8a7V2P7NJ1k0w>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 414CC10266;
 Fri,  8 Jun 2018 15:34:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 21:34:36 +0200
Message-ID: <2313832.VWfPkTLrhV@xps>
In-Reply-To: <20180608101511.567e4716@xeon-e3>
References: <20180608101511.567e4716@xeon-e3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK checkpatch and SPDX tags?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 19:34:40 -0000

08/06/2018 19:15, Stephen Hemminger:
> What ever happened to my patch to fix the DPDK checkpatch wrapper ignore fields?
> Is the build bot using current version?

There was a discussion about implementing more checks,
and I did not apply your patch.
It is a mistake because even if we need to implement more checks,
we must disable the Linux SPDX check.
That's why I'm applying your patch now.