DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Heinrich Kuhn <heinrich.kuhn@netronome.com>,
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] Refactor the NFP PMD
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:18:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2316407.RpMWIsvfqF@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210716083545.34444-1-heinrich.kuhn@netronome.com>

16/07/2021 10:35, Heinrich Kuhn:
> This patch set restructures the NFP PMD, aligning it more with the
> common layout adopted by most other PMD's. Although the changes look
> fairly large, functionally nothing is added or removed from the driver
> and the existing code is mostly just reorganized into the familiar
> structure seen in other PMD's.

It seems this refactoring is destroying this firmware improvement:
	https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=40edb9c0d36b781

Please rebase carefully, keeping the behaviour really intact.

> Apart form adopting the common PMD layout
> this change should also aid in future feature development to the NFP
> PMD. The previous layout where most of the logic resided in a single
> file (nfp_net.c) would have become tedious to support going forward.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-23  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-16  8:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] net/nfp: split rxtx headers into separate file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] net/nfp: move rxtx functions to their own file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] net/nfp: move CPP bridge to a separate file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] net/nfp: prototype common functions in header file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] net/nfp: move VF functions into new file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] net/nfp: move PF " Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] net/nfp: batch file rename for consistency Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] Refactor the NFP PMD Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/7] net/nfp: split rxtx headers into separate file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/7] net/nfp: move rxtx functions to their own file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/7] net/nfp: move CPP bridge to a separate file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] net/nfp: prototype common functions in header file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/7] net/nfp: move VF functions into new file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/7] net/nfp: move PF " Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-16  8:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/7] net/nfp: batch file rename for consistency Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-23  9:18   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-07-29 13:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] Refactor the NFP PMD Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-29 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-29 13:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] net/nfp: split rxtx headers into separate file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-29 13:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/7] net/nfp: move rxtx functions to their own file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-29 13:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/7] net/nfp: move CPP bridge to a separate file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-29 13:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/7] net/nfp: prototype common functions in header file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-08-17 14:44       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-17 16:29         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-29 13:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/7] net/nfp: move VF functions into new file Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-29 13:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/7] net/nfp: move PF " Heinrich Kuhn
2021-07-29 13:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/7] net/nfp: batch file rename for consistency Heinrich Kuhn
2021-08-13 12:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] Refactor the NFP PMD Heinrich Kuhn
2021-08-13 14:47       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-17 16:29     ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2316407.RpMWIsvfqF@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=heinrich.kuhn@netronome.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).