From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E86A00E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:39:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9441B951;
	Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:39:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3CB23D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:39:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C9421F2E;
 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:39:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:39:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
 bh=Ofuc0lVacltncu9iYaVqD/27TeqNpxSraiYriX4SjWI=; b=XLMqlFyu+AMv
 wuPqppECPnmvrAx9S7/Hq03dJt1g6NKxZFS4oYD3hPiJcyA8rCEXIzbQRK/MDWHP
 XX+qRULhSrQQRepmrK88xeR+S8k5IKzEmxx+T5UZNp5W4uRwkc3dxJ8HNYI4gpZ0
 y7dNHNyLXyq1o9HwxxeuWJveqRR8I1o=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Ofuc0lVacltncu9iYaVqD/27TeqNpxSraiYriX4Sj
 WI=; b=GQl3iLaoSOieOUlBjxe+WvrvxI2INsr9p+CEmOCZ+wwJ9Bag/HX899pHO
 p+bgazXKuz+DcC364L+r4P+SXfGnLI4RKa2lOvvFf8ZYpM9s3TcErZj5pZSIxUza
 mfkWXXp5H1T9M4EuqEMD4gOCtO1uXJ0UJylkyd7N8COmlJnIhxXj/G3vhd39R6JG
 IjAO5dE9zMuKL73RJNxxpRPc0Rc1kpEFuZUXhLrRbn7fYDdJiiXeBkIeLpwVhaJR
 qU7ETD9/GxGBnmaZn1wShulkLV4OcC6xwHAccV09W0Hv6OMmJAYUr+gCWLJpXiO/
 G6MrDwLZj3SWSMPk3neZhrvOnS+fA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Jk8DXT18oaMnJOFELFd561B69BKkxygCzq2RI8ZwLbD9LGDahvZFOg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudeitddguddvgecutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh
 necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd
 enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm
 rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc
 fkphepuddviedrvdduuddruddvjedrleeinecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeht
 hhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Jk8DXVmZXpailjw1frHjTIi04JeZjXnE66jdbabeyh1BkCW9qefEXg>
 <xmx:Jk8DXcbnKlbhgUf88CFwOKX7jqlcnLLE3i5SuPBWAA6rZUONmMIVbw>
 <xmx:Jk8DXbovA2nxW3YcCGLumwX20_EMlYjpVa324JAOnoimVwwqzW18Og>
 <xmx:Jk8DXYdAMrGB8Bes0nEJMd4Y7HaV-8z54BmZgM2oGJTXIpfxaQ5iDQ>
Received: from xps.localnet (om126211127096.13.openmobile.ne.jp
 [126.211.127.96])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0B7DE380083;
 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:39:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:39:12 +0900
Message-ID: <2320193.YWZSPdnyqu@xps>
In-Reply-To: <20190405203036.27109-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
References: <20190405203036.27109-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: resort symbols in EXPERIMENTAL section
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger:
> The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic
> order but running sort showed several mistakes.
> 
> This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise.
> Purely for humans.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort.
I would prefer to leave it as is.