From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28DEA00E6 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 12:43:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9177A1BE3B; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 12:43:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B401BE39 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 12:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362EE447; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 06:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Aug 2019 06:43:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=DJCbFW59aXbj58CQV+rYMV6AoP95iNKKataCfXw5jt8=; b=ZZoUMr9AolPe W7CssMDB4RT19RWxVSrqYj71C8EIGK7KfIO/XO6DkXKlfB6Zk+7cKtp3zr/Uiuye PEmEkRnEKcoT0lqYK/C1u4Rmszwg9rO4p2G1BK/hXOk9bukiItDpsE4OYZwvfXv2 p0xJ3/9QclvGhQVT/xAU7v9hhAzPtFk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=DJCbFW59aXbj58CQV+rYMV6AoP95iNKKataCfXw5j t8=; b=C88G2opmWhvBkZexKZZO6rRJ1bY0gi8eHk6/dzTQf9k/jJyDeQxn3hhRC 4UgjYyagxy3rjDMVQbNd5IbCx34dfrg0ubVgq/BWLPSgRebZQOQceRLV4nKULSIA qXCNlTwlZMELBMc1tRGau9br5ywuraiBWDlbC7kFbZHfETyuJHp4rYpRlm7av6oA jMsAgOZ+6BORQmtnP2VNtn286TSxQkg3M1GwTDAI2fqWxvqHyXwafg/Z4pgDYjWv jT6sFERvDH2KtCtZxEjP3FH9qsezkxV5BLZL61X7ga2M3SbWgnr+yy9OCEoLn+9q 1y+x2c1KB5/W2sjHtcr+RjRlBl+PQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddruddutddgfeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeelfedriedrudegledruddugeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhm rghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BB7E180060; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 06:42:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , "Singh, Jasvinder" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 12:42:58 +0200 Message-ID: <2346997.vLtd3DEVLB@xps> In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891268E8F62EE@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190731113322.135053-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891268E8F62EE@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/ip_pipeline: remove tc ov flag from pipe profile cli X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 31/07/2019 14:19, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > From: Singh, Jasvinder > > Subject: [PATCH] examples/ip_pipeline: remove tc ov flag from pipe profile > > cli > > > > Since sched library always check the non-zero value of subport tc > > ov weight. Therefore, it is necessary to set right value of tc ov > > weight even if RTE_SCHED_SUBPORT_TC_OV is disabled. If I understand well, this is fixing something, but what? Please could you propose a better title and a "Fixes" line? Thanks