From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7096E2B97 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 01:28:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id l68so8182068wml.0 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:28:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6tT3gTiKSGm8JkWJG9bjRQ+KEhSJs1UhWEfBGZtgQH4=; b=Z2P22eO7dx1QNPNFmibMPPJP/daQGBZi6BIDGYbizzdc51rccMImBLnfmvuzb0fyeh +mfnTcZrnRt1lYUmAwhk7oTWb2duOYqtmbMi6Wz6udWRPBoyg4bjfd/9VsE0c8Ov0TV0 OqYdOW/mxSk9W3WuWGQ4ygFTVOClhhGlZ3TBirMfxcy03tQpOElqWyJHd2Xickg9E3TV senr6LjfY0z7a3R+Hc4Da1TM5twz4lS8h5Zo31y33LBWy38k5r56mL6aWpcYOBPUnjkK R//AmFIwSiK3UqGm1a2XCCOF/XIbUFiMCoQfdMNJVZ9kKEMrxKIikdfEKPaRcpHS6jTL Y+Jw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6tT3gTiKSGm8JkWJG9bjRQ+KEhSJs1UhWEfBGZtgQH4=; b=d8g5pImFwaoSBiNWJTev+Mom0QTDfWETPE20lVsU0SJtO6hQRlu+RwMGESbjldjXMA wgePs7nvOqPszQwXlFPuMYNHdX/iK3TFNEj2flxngYrde1njgprqtxsVdL2Hu0vPGU+E aSUHqTEF94IJ/1Jx1XZJ/ueucVz4YU34ZoQbi8euCrIbTKkuSvHT93uoPW005ySiXtHY 72vd1DPCH/9el0gQfifbjcraqU7ZeaCAG/tj6sflE8GxrnLsP0WlCc6/xB9ruPKciU7O cU7jztOH8tstLj643zY1K0R+J3ylVttONfRmnzaJMuJJutHZGD5Miw3vwAw7akNtO7B+ KwXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIR/dBe+d5RVI/1m277brc1UHRUt5pOJiSR1YaKO3T0H4HxKWJdltLpI1MGPDitby8e X-Received: by 10.28.138.149 with SMTP id m143mr519023wmd.94.1457569720297; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:28:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (91.111.75.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.75.111.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e127sm911096wma.20.2016.03.09.16.28.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:28:39 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jasvinder Singh Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 01:26:59 +0100 Message-ID: <2351691.tuJXt9sbsx@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1454606182-38449-1-git-send-email-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> References: <1453889757-115360-1-git-send-email-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> <1454606182-38449-1-git-send-email-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ip_pipeline: add load balancing function to pass-through pipeline X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:28:40 -0000 2016-02-04 17:16, Jasvinder Singh: > The pass-through pipeline implementation is extended with load balancing > function. This function allows uniform distribution of the packets among > its output ports. For packets distribution, any application level logic > can be applied. For instance, in this implementation, hash value > computed over specific header fields of the incoming packets has been > used to spread traffic uniformly among the output ports. The following > pass-through configuration can be used for implementing load balancing > function over ipv4 traffic; Please rebase, thanks