From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4B02A62 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:08:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EF220DFD; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 06:08:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 06:08:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=Nkwtaul0hLL3UAjDCOPXOo/2am Id54uO/aRr1dST+/Y=; b=YiM3Hs9ICVPKTrx7rHY/pUafyLqKKnqbRIR1C+uJJp 60K/BLSBLo9Om/kBgqGa1MVVEndAEFwj/nMjaZuGM3O22IMREc2Z+BvdtvI4TnYL AFmZV/oNwkkAEorM6G+yj/hzb7tu35Uo3o1vzGZ4ltW3l+G/O4HIyYE9NI2cFUY3 8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Nkwtau l0hLL3UAjDCOPXOo/2amId54uO/aRr1dST+/Y=; b=ONUD8XLkT44csUcMWF7vyU Mcd1EW2IECGLOTX7b64ZUR7n1hM0xKzueWs/8Pp5oRFRqcD1+orLGh89PnJFzcgr 3F14JL2TDQKnOb3y7zKKOrMPEMZKXq1lTduthReqjJl9SFy3d5GWGkXm1hHhU9z5 JtO+shh9RWz8SFhyRJSRO0MDe55CHnF9AlQZzxXtcH6TmGDdYrqq3N+77vbiyOL0 +MFH9XoVJIdmSmejMiF1Iv40p1KlWqBs8FRyhMTMga+E6blRIvDV5q+KNTzxzj9z QoQy70xTA5Fpp9pagho1NlWZ7P2gOEuR/KK89M0WtgBA8jg0OqZy0nJsZCUzxldw == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CF35610258; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 06:08:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jianfeng.tan@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:08:29 +0200 Message-ID: <2360089.qufSKTD6lu@xps> In-Reply-To: <2dc81fb9-5926-f595-27fc-1eee07d6e21b@intel.com> References: <338e432277f98a206df87e7808ec799de28535ce.1521895541.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> <2165690.q5cnMgZWhB@xps> <2dc81fb9-5926-f595-27fc-1eee07d6e21b@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: rename IPC sync request to pending request X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:08:51 -0000 28/03/2018 11:15, Burakov, Anatoly: > On 27-Mar-18 5:27 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 27/03/2018 15:59, Anatoly Burakov: > >> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > >> Suggested-by: Jianfeng Tan > >> Acked-by: Jianfeng Tan > > > > You probably have a good explanation for this change. > > Please explain in the commit message. > > > > Generally speaking, every commits should have an explanation, > > it is a basic quality rule. > > Thanks > > > > This is just to reduce noise in the following patch. No Anatoly, you should explain why a rename is needed.