From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F44A32A4 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:54:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1971D41E; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE771C2DE for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:54:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85DB210F2; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:54:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:54:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=GY038cTt73X9EzxFx+TC+oozx9yhhy1DPXB71L1Iwoo=; b=jxrKACL9C98E +iRc27VnvrMIcfKEbEa1gc21qtzhWneNdoGiokwkXD05AfsUbzRkxD7Vtc1dVAi9 x4z09o4g59LBvQXxnyrSrrB6qeORRzMeb8zA74YYw+Lxi5ZaUj5Fd/O7aHVEAnXe mSG6/LaPANbV6EhgLb9vN4YYvQVcfko= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=GY038cTt73X9EzxFx+TC+oozx9yhhy1DPXB71L1Iw oo=; b=ZVIkr8gcgeADDfinatjKoWTgI3xVo7TjGCW0BJKmCsoA+r1URCTc/6HjO ywhaKn3h9x254jPWY7Rz1PD3YXPViCqPTVcbYQUULimYkVDSVgJU5u6YjorL1e0Z YyrGuSHz0tVqXtNAiyKulHYN1lmYKdcbHOpn/Pef5mpL1WKx40xKt747xBs3sR8w Q2/he9ir51JXcX5qK2qxgITlkU0P7UVSaWjc9SBBoZ4otek+kAKhKQqLnl0tdjPo L3WjqeCkeborv8SYxok+AcaMwu5MkUlaufClX6zPDhdVL7ybS0O+iPHXsZzQdyc7 i3afXjdaWJXeaKfO7NaSb2Xc0DYYA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrleefgdelhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5647AD6005A; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:54:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jasvinder Singh Cc: dev@dpdk.org, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:54:49 +0200 Message-ID: <2364755.d5n0nWWb86@xps> In-Reply-To: <20191025105124.6950-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> References: <20191024184630.66881-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> <20191025105124.6950-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/15] sched: subport level configuration of pipe nodes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 25/10/2019 12:51, Jasvinder Singh: > This patchset refactors the dpdk qos sched library to allow subport > level configuration flexibility of the pipe nodes. > > Currently, all parameters for the pipe nodes (subscribers) > configuration are part of the port level structure which forces > all groups of subscribers (pipes) in different subports to > have similar configurations in terms of their number, queue sizes, > traffic-classes, etc. > > The new implementation moves pipe nodes configuration parameters > from port level to subport level structure. This allows different > subports of the same port to have different configuration for the > pipe nodes, for examples- number of pipes, queue sizes, pipe > profiles, etc. > > In order to keep the implementation complexity under control, all > pipes within the same subport share the same configuration for queue > sizes. > > v7: > - rebase on latest dpdk master > - fix build issue with clang > > v6: > - fix build issue with patchset Now it compiles fine :) Applied, thanks