From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441EE201
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:21:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8FF20BA5;
 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 04:21:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 04:21:29 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
 bh=QTwuzstfbI+0AFqpL1NVr2kFJsaOyuZE0A0WSajigOk=; b=UgRhm5KOVzjE
 n82Of2jeVlhdvoJ62Dlo6ZVJijpCBtWA0Ui6M89XQpNB/nOd0t2pxwbYh6RWATvW
 7R0OPZYVAR1qRZsX7RjMoKMvuDWR5Q6qEw9+yNCIMT9vsSfq805sd1HknxQnpegG
 KEj1UEjRdMMrPH7iqbgjfv8USPh/LrI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=QTwuzstfbI+0AFqpL1NVr2kFJsaOyuZE0A0WSajig
 Ok=; b=V6SzvaR8eF5HeYhUYz5MMm7MgmCseAEZMrxIJMtnjUwO52eubzJPkRacQ
 3NDscBrTMqZyey6jGihhvM5lUQ+rSpvpvs3AHiHdCZUm01wVgAqeJYXOGftBMNRc
 cRs8olZaYjHoh4+OSXM+uzR3Bc3kjdvAoT4TMyipng6FyGmMnds4v2n1qldBCYJH
 60ZpsBeR/NguMMmKdVMXPiybgn8Kc4yNgpAbpNzpKu8tZpbHortE/7RY4a3FP1f5
 Yz86E0Yk4eY5UakaL72mTBW8YkqVoiieU8LV/AiujRFf4Du2WN9SqnsTMF3OVP8z
 AcDvrR1klcodmyhZniT1QKW4/zFzg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:mJfqW4p5K1OeBp2E3Ea3YGcQ_EHfrKrqBJlN16EAtDzLxf66_sfOWA>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:mJfqW1ULPe_FBwT1TclXpeiwnR_ORwnWVT2MPtv1HS4P9zMNysdJKg>
 <xmx:mJfqW81-_6RbT_rH5pDNMSB0WWPY96vX91CIbnUIL2xxJ9DVt_PhSw>
 <xmx:mJfqW8RyMaibZgeG1lTkOMEuSEzU0MioDt4bE9CwUw0TBb0zPo0hXA>
 <xmx:mJfqW4R9RO7iOXrFZ8vA-_yfUtlKdOA8UhnW8I0GmW_RZwb19n6C2w>
 <xmx:mJfqW1VIvMctKVrpRsHQNtweHCK_GmsjSwof3-Ch4IndiSC8SSsPWw>
 <xmx:mZfqW90ebnpGaOC_jZFpDTt-7bdKiwKEyxnSr2YyW6u9vbEmAd9TIA>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 54323E40E6;
 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 04:21:28 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Burdick, Cliff" <Cliff.Burdick@viasat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:21:27 +0100
Message-ID: <2381267.oLnQdW0j6H@xps>
In-Reply-To: <03A7D9A58FAFB54FBB01FEE199D7308A0134B8EE1F@wdc1exchmbxp02.hq.corp.viasat.com>
References: <03A7D9A58FAFB54FBB01FEE199D7308A0134B8EE1F@wdc1exchmbxp02.hq.corp.viasat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: Don't fail secondary if primary is
	missing tailqs
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:21:30 -0000

13/11/2018 00:33, Burdick, Cliff:
> This patch was submitted by Jean Tourrilhes over two years ago, but didn't receive any responses. I hit the same issue recently when trying to use cgo (Golang) as a primary process linked to libdpdk.a against a C++ application linked against the same library.

The question is to know why you don't have the same constructors in primary and seconday?