From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9572A0C4B; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:30:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17714069C; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:30:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239C940696 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:30:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4185C0196; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 06:30:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Jul 2021 06:30:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= RXYJYPyzJIqZcCVLQmwtdxKd5R+Xmm8TVGUj2CevhXI=; b=mcOUhxntrXuzcXgu DP0KR0aBB64CA1c5M5hxyKlSL4Cbd9kkzogRo+JPLNXoq4irWPAN23lymMeQjKup /iq6RNATm4LBH5VfXo/ohojX0wqbvj7sKS33KUROm9KmQQ27UcHhdEkKVlzI/TpF /dFd+N52uqk4TE5Rc652iJT3GHsGp6EWh8OWGmIYe0ptkdObfH1IyhtlCG+levt+ FyzD0aD7cjtviz3V3U/9rLD/g/8EfrUX4t3gnDfkU6+GJjBGosx6RHsb/x7+Ry+R mPkhcMYkwD8ZCN1C5owdATaVQ9V7CpWiu+Uk8C4fOOTdgbpuwghxZs3/cuq83tYk SAZb+Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=RXYJYPyzJIqZcCVLQmwtdxKd5R+Xmm8TVGUj2Cevh XI=; b=lrzltFVY+CAJJY3LuvBjkT14Ar1vzhMEYsMm7S5BRA4KK/dn+lAmhMdnY nCPcTWy2KTyF4EUf/oG14qOyCUxKd91B4/TiQhZQai04Ek5Mr5vzCRlXeS9DRkGn DAm0UIkWJ4zlAfNY4crChdcYruYbuh6wiOC2MfXUWv6lcLHyYeccbEtU/pePl4FK 7m+bCGMWWcg9E9hPQIAUBB1anaxMijS68k6jUMg7QF3RqGwKvxHse7MBsd4hwBEL 0RhCJXgAxLB6UrMp3gyH99zXOoq7Ay/8FKBwEwU1FpkbAdkprSb79ScfbUilqY02 mnT3GpQMM52Zb1hpuyaSr0a1Kxajw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrtdeggddvjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeduveevueefhfdvgeeuveejgeffudehveegveekveegteehgefgudek leefffekueenucffohhmrghinhepfehgphhprdhorhhgpdhivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlh hushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshes mhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 06:30:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Raslan Darawsheh , Andrew Rybchenko Cc: "Singh, Aman Deep" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , Olivier Matz Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 12:29:59 +0200 Message-ID: <2382288.oLYEJliquk@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210617091716.2354978-1-rasland@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/07/2021 11:39, Andrew Rybchenko: > On 7/8/21 12:27 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote: > > Thank you for the review, > > > > Basically it's not used yet since it will break the abi > > The main usage was in rte_flow item of gtp_psc > > To replace the current structure with the header definition. And since > > this will break the abi I'm adding the header definition now but will be > > used later in rte_flow. > > @Thomas If so, should we accept it in the current release cycle > or should it simply wait for the code which uses it? If no need, we can wait next release. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Andrew Rybchenko > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 8, 2021, 12:23 PM > > *To:* Raslan Darawsheh; Singh, Aman Deep; dev@dpdk.org > > *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc > > > > Hi Raslan, > > > > On 7/6/21 5:24 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote: > >> Hi Guys, > >> > >> Sorry for missing this mail, for some reason it was missed in my inbox, > >> This is the link to this rfc: > >> https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38_series/38.415/38415-g30.zip > > > > > > Thanks for the link. The patch LGTM, but I have only one question left. > > Where is it used? Are you going to upstream corresponding code in > > the release cycle? > > > > Andrew. > > > >> Kindest regards, > >> Raslan Darawsheh > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: dev On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko > >>> Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 5:06 PM > >>> To: Singh, Aman Deep ; dev@dpdk.org > >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc > >>> > >>> Hi Raslan, > >>> > >>> could you reply, please. > >>> > >>> Andrew. > >>> > >>> On 6/22/21 10:27 AM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote: > >>>> Hi Raslan, > >>>> > >>>> Can you please provide link to this RFC 38415-g30 I just had some > >>>> doubt on byte-order conversion as per RFC 1700 > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> Aman