From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D7D8D86 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:07:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so17137212wme.1 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 03:07:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=TUVHKwa8qacz48AwP7wSrRzqjgB5GrmNzraNM97fxN8=; b=suTI+ht8j7SDJv+lAXNpPw65PkmYSnXosgOiDkvRAHa2h9tOKj8V8NBQC9SoF59WMa cqykjp6674VKWDEXGK7QBG0W8/UyZcV+oLwYiVpgrMUW00ABointdDIUq5fIl3mKyJQR HKJ0FWDoXFI7OpV2Kj+uHhzeJGK2V85y53ZGZagNC7o2QbIPHJQNqeJ0djZZQ19s2MQs mj8e1z3E8XcfxU7ilYZHiQUSneGqroRXEVWAbaPgK3Vzvg9Z+X5UULEUwXDMDD3VRoSB 0jdX5PnW6uioZg9LjiiVZhrnUfEC6qe6waHuz2Q7LbNQdQwg+dk2U4ytZCjOs6jbiHzr AFWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=TUVHKwa8qacz48AwP7wSrRzqjgB5GrmNzraNM97fxN8=; b=H3p8Tp4I/vulctxM2thA9Vfe1sXO3NDcjZ2nnt03zPBTQ4kFI6BQtpSACQ0ampNx5D ercSzLNTlhtXnQ4Ib12uHRLoeLaYf1amd032xLYWjWdIkH1PgaAP60HfmWNW2o3wPPA8 ts7U2mQpip4I+qewholDTLHzs732p/eJraFBeizEdOVVWXY0oE1A6bkJ9HlmxVmL0yQy ZijM3JRJ4F73oaEQyINKTvInIHIbGiOEJGw0DEgfpYdFdrRzeM595JLocXhqjBCGl2SN egrY/1pKWv2G3gmY6QIB0AVHPVpkI2uOll8ALWtNW8Lamp0SJPdilFy/SxiwS4EPCJvr N/kA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm5k/yurIDWacbirraTwAG5SRR2zL+JQQTG2HFDCFvBDiPiJ8zNk7fSpmDR8g6jmznxamHx X-Received: by 10.195.11.101 with SMTP id eh5mr10413303wjd.104.1449140870596; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 03:07:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h67sm34915288wmf.17.2015.12.03.03.07.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Dec 2015 03:07:50 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:06:41 +0100 Message-ID: <2383099.4onlEHILsb@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1904583.t7IonTIn7B@xps13> References: <1449028676-19232-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <20151203105752.GA7864@bricha3-MOBL3> <1904583.t7IonTIn7B@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] standard make install X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 11:07:50 -0000 2015-12-03 12:02, Thomas Monjalon: > 2015-12-03 10:57, Bruce Richardson: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:01:57AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > > > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > > > behaviours. > > > > > How compatible are we looking for here. The standard way of compiling up DPDK > > up till now has always been "make install T=$RTE_TARGET", but that seems to no > > longer work. > > > > bruce@silpixa00389037-Fedora:dpdk-clean$ echo $RTE_TARGET > > x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc > > > > bruce@silpixa00389037-Fedora:dpdk-clean$ make install T=$RTE_TARGET > > /home/bruce/dpdk-clean/mk/rte.vars.mk:58: /home/bruce/dpdk-clean/build/.config: No such file or directory > > /home/bruce/dpdk-clean/mk/rte.vars.mk:83: *** RTE_ARCH is not defined. Stop. > > /home/bruce/dpdk-clean/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:98: recipe for target 'install' failed > > make: *** [install] Error 2 > > > > When I look for backward compatibilty, this is the main thing I look for, as I'm > > not aware of anyone (on my team here at least!) who does a make config first etc. > > When developing, most people just do a "make install T=..."straight up. > > I agree. > And it works on my machine. > I'd like to understand what is the problem on yours. My bad. When deleting build/.config, the bug appears. I will fix it. Sorry for the inconvenience.