From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA4AA32A2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:44:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FAF1EB7F; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:44:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97691EB57 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:44:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04C75A4; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:44:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:44:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=4G2XoAjryMDODlHUPlHJe0e4t/lZ8PCyNLSs8Ye1L4w=; b=gO/oKb7zl/ps 2tQlu7K98y1ULhEnfIA3R7kH6+J41S/ID7MrHwnjMMD6QgfOfjJ4a3fLu8YzfZ/H k0ppIuQuNFQZQ9/HAUED5ZSxeooFP50g5lOUhXR/++/BnMuJneIvR9ywInD/GZHT pcaaTfds2v+ZjJtba5jRPB5LHtAv/3U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=4G2XoAjryMDODlHUPlHJe0e4t/lZ8PCyNLSs8Ye1L 4w=; b=klmuZ1PCexA/CG0rWWBH2HVqXj1Q4dzlwHDO0kIWwjov7VMK+Ag746wHy UsisukLGfySBob9PwnQ1ZRwWonY5mHB7VegvzRFfPvCktCok5qapNQmq2kbAiBZy 1ZmRBvoirdhqgFqL8I7moxMkv8Vw/nIwGuwqLcGRIcAO0P76O+uNroeicA5NShiq mMhnefkcEd6zb4x83Ks1pHhplIDEX+mG83109hcvrDDpBUtwyEsiRrKZNhyCITKU osRhNTjwHvD1bCxAQIOTrIv8Y3UGjfvUUkiguoHEoc9QpBcswLaxopVlBWOIdKU3 Qmt8QsWxE9eHgBkDgWdFNuHpU4SSg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrledugddutdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 43B5FD6005F; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:44:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jasvinder Singh Cc: dev@dpdk.org, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, Lukasz Krakowiak Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:44:32 +0200 Message-ID: <2389776.HqK4uhrzsa@xps> In-Reply-To: <20191014172347.139114-7-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> References: <20191014120951.152654-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> <20191014172347.139114-1-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> <20191014172347.139114-7-jasvinder.singh@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/15] sched: modify pkt enqueue for config flexibility X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 14/10/2019 19:23, Jasvinder Singh: > Modify scheduler packet enqueue operation of the scheduler to allow > different subports of the same port to have different configuration > in terms of number of pipes, pipe queue sizes, etc. > > Signed-off-by: Jasvinder Singh > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Krakowiak > --- [..] > - struct rte_sched_subport *s = port->subport + (qindex / rte_sched_port_queues_per_subport(port)); fatal error: unused function 'rte_sched_port_queues_per_subport' Looks like we need a v6 :)