From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3196A046B for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:43:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D10D1C12D; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:43:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163111C12C for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:43:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7044420A3C; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:43:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:43:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=HRxV1EX4D2W2OL4L3g+kBuv9p+t2ZCQv7EVb3l3iwsE=; b=rz85PFFIkRbY Uj3GdJN0+yC4X1URgRNkmYRD+uxa3XLEHYqdrJn9iA8z+PSzVdBbWB52paAFFe7/ KnZkWX7msXAJ6MerxZfgljnYJsMN+euotQwpiiHNxmg9a/FQPetoYU02KxRKBOdW n7RDkc1hDyaunweg0DJiNthsf7311XA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HRxV1EX4D2W2OL4L3g+kBuv9p+t2ZCQv7EVb3l3iw sE=; b=DPmFZHBPVvEkL7x33Pg7b5SM3t5NH9Z/WiyYZOVGCtqV6QRKa8tiiwA2a KeIYU1AJGJGsCBwMNMHiluoMEFU2mBEVidJPThrMLkVhhFT/UpTLInmmzl/V/rjD hsq/TauEZQxb5LQG248UuIhRZp1VhvLw7gQ84UQQLxi8Cb7AAPCLC8cpH4+K0ZJW NQdqLRGqi2RZmEvTiNUS+GAZ2X7DXLnT4Zf3GP5FRqvOmLAKSovrpzedL3tH2EfV nU/FJVe5CL8S2qbAtMJFu02os4aQ7jHbmGSalLG07Cb9mnR99/p4iIdrxWua7/S8 NzztRnOtFTdkmbbhEJP5ujhIAHJIQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrjeelgdduvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeelfedriedrudegledruddugeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhm rghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0A841380074; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:43:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" , "dev@dpdk.org" , nd , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "pbhagavatula@marvell.com" Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:43:02 +0200 Message-ID: <2403061.WFEaHbX8XL@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1561911676-37718-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> <1592812.pb4V1II4kn@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] use WFE for locks and ring on aarch64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 24/07/2019 04:44, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > > 23/07/2019 21:15, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > > > Hi Gavin, > > > I think this should have been V1 (I mean, no versioning, just 'PATCH'), > > since it is converted to patch. I think we should be able to resend it as V1 and > > mark this V3 as 'superseded'. > > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > Please let us know if it is worth/helps fixing the version. > > > > I don't follow why it should be v1. > > This patch series was a RFC (RFC V1 and RFC v2). It is converted to a patch, I thought it should start with V1. No it can keep incrementing, it is OK and clear.