From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6429B1B28F; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:45:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97041213DD; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:45:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:45:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=vc5Zet5klU1cJaC5QZOEApUJxR 4hEXRiRz59ytgmqRo=; b=VHILbQzWJyHm+VG/BxGXkVjl7t2ptEtofvs9mEGnmH I76Tdp66eSjIQOZXWMvcZwcMu2STs1D8XGCvGszwvGUGBSOiFWGdqAKGRvKKQgDN oyKpPAZokXcYy27r03P+jWLg0PhX+P/yowUEF6I+jdZ32V30wcnVjvw462VHTn6i w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=vc5Zet 5klU1cJaC5QZOEApUJxR4hEXRiRz59ytgmqRo=; b=PO/Ck5eieE7a6Y3lq3BhKF f81Jw37ee75/IPJbCoJmDORp2ofXTkw2KEdF8lkXZ0T1932LRgN6dBWjqTb8gM6G keTA3TGMRudsIUSh7OSN2jFTgKhGKDY8Vza0v266FcZTHqQj8b4f0N+XnwGQvh6n o6xjQT3oPFCIHq7kDy/63geOcXhYshsdi0SCtcmqWuQ8/H7d4+eYQx05w06vjYIW 8E3W7ZRzTnDD26egvntPZuYPAxWWMJBckFqOhVGJdBQWMB/htUPomFkiiuz2/0k1 SWctVagSwUZGSF5VctrLTXC+IMd6OXErHz8I17Dh1Xu9GduZKirtTC88t0RRCqfA == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 369207E571; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:45:22 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Maxime Coquelin Cc: stable@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, yliu@fridaylinux.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, victork@redhat.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, jianfeng.tan@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, zhihong.wang@intel.com, qian.q.xu@intel.com, lei.a.yao@intel.com Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:45:12 +0100 Message-ID: <2419328.12RB65Uumv@xps> In-Reply-To: <20180212154612.5297-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> References: <20180212154612.5297-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 0/3] Vhost & Virtio fixes for v18.02 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:45:24 -0000 12/02/2018 16:46, Maxime Coquelin: > The second revision of this series includes Olivier's patch as first > patch in order to ease Thomas job when applying. > > Patch 2 rewords the commit message with detailed informations > provided by Tiwei and olivier (Thanks!). It also moves call to > virtio_rxq_vec_setup() and removes virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill_simple() > as no more used. > > Maxime Coquelin (2): > virtio: fix resuming port with rx vector path > vhost: don't take access_lock on VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER > > Olivier Matz (1): > net/virtio: fix mbuf data offset for simple Rx function Applied, thanks