From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9955DA0548; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:54:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4E741749; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:54:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3294741735 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:54:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5C85C018F; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:54:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:54:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= mQODdGX+PcuK1jIGa5sblZ3VTQ914yh3HjLwGBgAqSM=; b=CU6vT/c0PgeIHsKr pe57405YWQcBCwLEkiIJRP5iEFI9W6RsqauAkLM9qxvs6DxgOVrTWEr6npMQg0Jr 5rrUbMicJ1llgjd/QqGArCpZB97+oRfNJ9aDZD1JX+Wmq2Cqp5YNwyXGKJvu+UNs qpMz4tEqWiqqQ0avKT593Rhz5yh6e1GombSD4GF3Fo3veBU9kbg1wZGVOWe1dHVx 3UnRtiUfbIRSdXRAMVEurhFFLhpOWC8uY0M8iYBvM0Wzv7+f0jEL61GLsbziIYoV IAj0mgK89GwpinB2xG9xep3LSDtDpkiUDgjIldBGLIT8GapLxeZ0STLn3xJMBzQ+ a3TJLw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=mQODdGX+PcuK1jIGa5sblZ3VTQ914yh3HjLwGBgAq SM=; b=k0vcNzZnVxAdSn97cgr1ndla3aYVwVhReG+K7/fCQD4UFMixQt6wNnBYM 6NCdhcghoMoGNK1JJC0iy76Pux/4SwUtdwm4hUFOpTMX3r2VosyoCiC0+zGy23sd gqSv+dhFUtyZyF3HTmV5rR0I1qxXY2VUmHNxEcGMBLTUmGNBljr7bPmb4Wgxgqpb iF+6X3emJ+Ih0We0rB/Vf613DUqlYhlnrLNUo7XBtN0lJT7cE/anifAwKxRbWlkJ CXpEDPkQOX0fAJ+PGNTe1pQ8JNIv2uP8RZ7jvg4ikJxtFW1SYFz+SpyjlB40TNDP 2gf/XO08mxIoPYXa6zKfCK+Smwh2A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddtiedgjedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 183F0240068; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:54:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Dharmappa, Savinay" , "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , "Singh, Jasvinder" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:54:37 +0200 Message-ID: <2422637.nJklHjyONp@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210309160156.31183-1-savinay.dharmappa@intel.com> <2325405.dtkvFy6Hvi@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] sched : Initialize tc ov watermark. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 20/04/2021 12:36, Singh, Jasvinder: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > > > Ping > > > > 23/03/2021 17:02, Thomas Monjalon: > > > 09/03/2021 17:10, Savinay Dharmappa: > > > > tc ov watermark is initialized with computed value of max tc ov > > > > watermark. > > > > > > Sorry I don't understand what the change is doing. > > > Was there an issue? > > > > > > In the title, please avoid "tc ov" which is meaningless for most of > > > readers I guess. > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > This is a fix for oversubscription threshold value of traffic class which is computed later. We will re-spin the patch by mentioning "fix" in the message and title. Yes please give a clear explanation with full words, thanks.