From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8391A0C53; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:53:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B821141149; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:53:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D3941134 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:53:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635933207; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IaEe/2BrRYprtNu4owlKBy04Ur/rveAIFdOt01H8nX8=; b=SqZIdR5OloxYk/078oCi6hzdkzgP/iJ+YZ5ejPN4sqa4ZoYcJqyX6+eO//IMg+AC4b6KMU dEz9/HYLb6O1ri+Yh0ArIHG0c7/c2ayHDHDvNeZ98dUum2Flkn9Z31wqDkMbKOSBmDfU6l D1nvAnLfWvpdY3J+AEeaBH804Aht/Wo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-298-P0lXIa1EOFqEyDQVxP8C7g-1; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 05:53:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: P0lXIa1EOFqEyDQVxP8C7g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC2019253C7; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.36] (unknown [10.39.208.36]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 365ED60BF1; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <242aa665-45b6-2441-4288-26a4056dc3e2@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:52:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 From: Maxime Coquelin To: David Marchand , "Xia, Chenbo" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Liu, Changpeng" , Thomas Monjalon , Aaron Conole , dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org References: <20211102104748.57078-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> <3a63bda9-2ff7-30bc-87b7-48e1324d1666@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3a63bda9-2ff7-30bc-87b7-48e1324d1666@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: rename driver callbacks struct X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 11/3/21 09:38, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > Hi David, > > On 11/3/21 09:36, David Marchand wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:16 AM Xia, Chenbo wrote: >>> Testing issues reported in patchwork is expected as SPDK uses >>> this struct, so we can ignore it as SPDK will rename it when it >>> adapts to DPDK 21.11 >> >> Please, no. >> We can't simply say "ignore failure in CI". >> >> The SPDK build test must be disabled in CI first. >> You can create a bugzilla and assign it to UNH lab. >> Example: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 >> >> Once done, we can merge this patch in DPDK. >> >> >> In parallel, either prepare the patch or talk to SPDK guys to handle >> this change. >> Once this is done, update the bugzilla so that we can get SPDK build >> tested again in CI. > > Thanks for the insights, I'll file a Bz and work with the SPDK team. The Bz has been filed: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=876 > Maxime >> Thanks. >> >>