From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48597A04BA; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4501E34; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:09:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF75A3 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:09:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1D75C018E; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 06:09:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 06:09:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= PFWp/5W7be+8aAhiW1/7L3dkARtYPLYv5rc8TCdXh0g=; b=HADMfi5W3FxaT5Bh cpNLZxY6ZkCVlGxDdKpuErtWagMupGOJCLDSAdOYHF3pdBT9U8mIFcNDyxye2CLy E8B7ey6H4OzOJN7g13XO3jbyEo8NfQQ6Z9yk4mWL5mKRWfGhnu6jOxvrSFQcJc7y WkpyovaLDTtIaofHdWEfv5llZer5G+J7oJdmp9M6V5ux1SG/EboSgtC5LozN331F rdny1Nw1gZa7JXIuqYqG1gnpNHOogy2owXTDS7sPklSYY+Tf1IcDS2yyY2ILOXXJ HXVHWO7qaoZvkt4P4jRvjKRL13Qu1C+3Pbyn9x9oqihx/uUQiuyTbNkN5ENdiadn slSbug== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=PFWp/5W7be+8aAhiW1/7L3dkARtYPLYv5rc8TCdXh 0g=; b=hEaNEocRvYzdbQvkXgM2HGJbAzVYv066Wm3BZeT9kMDhI4Iza9GgrQdl0 qWfq5hqlZ4+LD/uta+zd/BReH5OxaYsxP/XXl7+kiB0EaKB9t5q76JC1HOlJWGXr jFa1JRF1AKMicyL0iF0embPW9/ZCoYLXXJ+TF+gMMZh/LwqQ72UOpWe/5kQnwkRn oouVc1brOsnT/EFudhQlcMdPKPc3ZwAI57Qj4JotuQMKCgqsW67HXR5ggiVIRYnA C42/6+UHhoIuOF5MGeSqrbzmB4J6I0ZlNMb9Jpr0MIx5YXffvJmpiG+ymo+8C1lE HrGm4yrzSohhSaU+CIWzLtPvfynFA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrgeeigddvgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9FDC5328005D; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 06:09:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Akhil Goyal , "nicolas.chautru@intel.com" , Maxime Coquelin Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "trix@redhat.com" , bluca@debian.org, ktraynor@redhat.com Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 12:09:35 +0200 Message-ID: <2443257.4GMkhuKzMg@thomas> In-Reply-To: <718b12e7-3d96-478e-71cb-4c6a5acfcaf8@redhat.com> References: <20201002085931.265699-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> <718b12e7-3d96-478e-71cb-4c6a5acfcaf8@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] baseband: fix drivers API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 07/10/2020 10:22, Maxime Coquelin: > Hi Akhil, > > Adding Thomas as he pulls your tree. > > On 10/6/20 9:42 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote: > > > >> > >> The series prefixes drivers APIs with rte__ in > >> order to avoid namespace pollution. > >> > >> These APIs are experimental, so no need to follow the > >> deprecation process. > >> > > Added Fixes commit in patch description. > > Thanks for applying it to your tree. > > I did not add Fixes tag and Cc'ed stable@dpdk.org on purpose, > because I thought it is was not a good idea to backport API changes, > even if this is experimental it might be annoying for the user. > > Thomas, do you confirm? Absolutely: API must not change in a stable branch. If an API is changed, it must be in the release notes. But stable branches are not allowed to update such sections of the release notes.