From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9DDA32A2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:55:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20D81EB5E; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:55:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DB61EB5C for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260AB40C; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:55:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:55:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=KnYF68zgecXG319o+31LMz6h00yDveDmSggMocayeIY=; b=CIbdz5CS986l 75RjM9PJAkNYrqQPDjPlo3RtUlAVgyLTfhFfQLnnbE5l3q/brCPTE4yZrmzh8hN6 XBtskHxYg7MF9gYbyt7M8JtjgQxBII0Ct2lpEzQBC947lEvOUymqDO9o7eYijXpO jbIy58fOpli9lCejKi60MHAojtxRG6w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KnYF68zgecXG319o+31LMz6h00yDveDmSggMocaye IY=; b=n6/VBExjYcINI1slOOkg1smsuSBLdrVC1OEPaBhBuksOg0J9r+HYV+JDG EO/9ogaQLJhRkBGR5Xytu8TJ8KYBfsGxac0RMRLU2WXhTmQZxO0nPW4tgl6Xs4wn Jdsrc6D4V7iOjtDSkcxpgNKCtSb4goU4l0NaC6IeARKVJIyrKLXofcluRYkYjMID 9IIDJZGO2Qa5kP1hCH6FJSEp0sVdJsHYvSNndc9gmT1wJ2QrQqLwMM7KdI8jga/s OMZjdlxpTcuSs2yphPW6bNdiH7choSBdkF+aTaQz56SOzsmSWx6kXyqlSPFa6bCn RXDD6fKNWTo8Vi5mSaw3CeAkCPHOw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrledugdelgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepthhrrghvihhsqdgtihdrtghomhenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddu keegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrd hnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B3AA7D6005A; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:55:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , bruce.richardson@intel.com Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:55:36 +0200 Message-ID: <2460805.kYZfEtWqMY@xps> In-Reply-To: <30b73eab-7ec8-cc01-5977-62648ac038b5@intel.com> References: <30b73eab-7ec8-cc01-5977-62648ac038b5@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/12] test/fib: add FIB library autotests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 01/10/2019 19:12, Medvedkin, Vladimir: > On 12/09/2019 15:07, Aaron Conole wrote: > > Vladimir Medvedkin writes: > > > >> Functional tests for the new FIB library. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin > >> --- > >> app/test/Makefile | 1 + > >> app/test/autotest_data.py | 6 + > >> app/test/meson.build | 3 + > >> app/test/test_fib.c | 397 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 4 files changed, 407 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 app/test/test_fib.c > >> > > Thanks so much for adding tests with your library. > > > > Please note that even after 30s, these tests don't complete: > > > > https://travis-ci.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/234132379 > > > > Can you restrict some of your lpm test vectors rather than looping > > through all of combinations? Or perhaps take the long poll tests and > > move them into a perf test? > > Sorry for the late reply. I'll try to make it work faster :) Because of the test duration, this series is waiting for a v6. I hope we could merge it in 19.11-rc2.