From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E7C558A for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 15:35:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id o80so62891639wme.1 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:35:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XvIe0e/3cP3f1ZXALJAab7o+owv5xobXZiKGf1KW78g=; b=YZ/iKvFf5caQxkE2QwqId98AuhSidByqI3RWenDo/2JUiianUOkQztjDFTx5PQxL3j SjdxARrslhJNA8JEWOGsVtaOpSauci1vszSMKDVAfRwoPGXTy/NKKnHVYf81olEpHC+r fMp1/E1sDMOdgBx1kNtNslHj/E6iXVSa87JY5mYllUEu0jDJYGXtLuYOy2Srv+hfVBbl 4z1ExeUUNquH5LEIPn/S6J042xGUJY+E/whvBrtSz/5xxmd8S19ujhs6B/NimcZ7UbBT xIEOgsNw2nN9E/0OhYS9mJKw324ok573DlmkrBez5tUkZ6buJZqhO04uWI9I3ax6Xct4 TNxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XvIe0e/3cP3f1ZXALJAab7o+owv5xobXZiKGf1KW78g=; b=hu/K48BwMQMUTA027Z5qKgh1fJq9CvAUrs9uDDB3Ly7yTGg2dIiy8HYMGxWsrgNJ0U i9vh+Ac0kh/zo6l8jq6ws8R3JrxO5vdF3AjoEtAE1ScBB9BQD5N9pTaeEfm1gl8V0YNo 1lyw9pldaP/loJpkMN4mUzLx+p3rqaBnuXU7Q5nVmFN4do4t306O8K4RQahujX9CkOmw d7o+Z6D5hlUZ8GT/jMgfCAdS7DGQvUX2dMBif22Z9LYz7FyZ7qxlLx7gzD1FrX4/YhNh 7MNhVDTgtQWMT58q99xF5Snmh2RRdLhs8LX0RzbvJ/6hjkjaI9nBdes9E37eUYlz3S5R v+GA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvP3MOz43eoTizRY7m+PFnTRBe2AzIJ+af2t1dltSJ7MGBNL4gSbXlibY0BB4w6mmvA X-Received: by 10.195.9.226 with SMTP id dv2mr26941933wjd.180.1469626520136; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b186sm7167000wmg.23.2016.07.27.06.35.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:35:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Hemant Agrawal Cc: Jerin Jacob , David Hunt , dev@dpdk.org, "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "viktorin@rehivetech.com" , Shreyansh Jain Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 15:35:18 +0200 Message-ID: <2462423.EsoJo7cWtt@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1626416.VyKLPpZHgH@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] usages issue with external mempool X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:35:20 -0000 2016-07-27 13:23, Hemant Agrawal: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > 2016-07-27 15:21, Jerin Jacob: > > > If we agree on this then may be I can send the API deprecation notices > > > for rte_mempool_create for v16.11 > > > > It would have been a lot better to send a patch during the 16.07 cycle to avoid > > breaking again the API. > > I'm afraid it will even be too late for the deprecation notice. > > [Hemant] Yes! It is late. > we can make these changes immediately after 16.07. You cannot change the API in 16.11 without having a deprecation agreement in 16.07.