From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6074945C0A; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:54:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3257F4014F; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:54:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAE540144 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:54:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33F7113E; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 05:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.58.134] (unknown [10.57.58.134]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4942F3F528; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 05:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <24664b53-e769-401d-8ca7-0474dfe4343a@arm.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:54:09 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dts: use TestSuiteSpec class imports Content-Language: en-GB To: Dean Marx Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Honnappa Nagarahalli , =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= , Paul Szczepanek References: <20240822163941.1390326-1-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> <20240822163941.1390326-5-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> From: Luca Vizzarro In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 01/10/2024 18:12, Dean Marx wrote: > > +            filtered_test_cases: list[TestCase] = [ > +                test_case > +                for test_case in test_suite_spec.test_cases > +                if not test_suite_config.test_cases_names > +                or test_case.name in > test_suite_config.test_cases_names > +            ] > > > Just wondering, what's the plan with the filtered test cases? I'm > assuming they're stored here so we can report which cases were skipped > after runtime? I believe this behaviour changed in the latest version I've sent. But the idea is that now we have TestCases as objects instead of strings, and the purpose of this is to retrieve all the objects from the user-provided strings.