From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8F74F91 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 21:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D44823E47; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:24:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 May 2019 15:24:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=kfV2eV3tEZpXnXW+d9S71YJ5OWelCvNI8+Pd+J4T+1Q=; b=NxqD0ox3LYXE VFlb0OLXSXAA5CfJmMyl3+WnxMMb7iM4LRJlUOSnKIhZmOMGXRJF0Jju2y2vj/uQ OKCOVFDFAuL2KN8mFPZjWQ2/G2ttob7ehoSYrEKaUjPgB3LDTZSSijtw+O+yeqL3 9T+ALfbXZpep5TNFidPsNc44Tik8p7E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=kfV2eV3tEZpXnXW+d9S71YJ5OWelCvNI8+Pd+J4T+ 1Q=; b=QhMb8yRIzixDmm0F+HUiLyWcnA2awtURlbSxjvpxC1/QEjvKDEIYtY3im QGNuFZJCnHizUdk4RU7VEqDypwF4HJA7AZ+qzFzNjq/TkzGvuVU0+3fDPAVgHxvQ MUzi4Fs8am36HYk2g/dxm8fM2XlQODg8w0sqq1ykIWDTK+nYoMYQxvDpOBG8JJyF ThI4l4L3Et2dLJzpSUYJtpZtvO7fyrZP/7sVy2s9UwaMqbA78vZY9uTBkaXyM3C2 RfCBsmExtIh6vN7TxQbDLuCTcY6rNBkp4t3mAbHZuqrarHJqDKaowjno9Wg55UtD N0CpN7YxDTDbRjoSPZAJ4lGdhL9ZA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrkeeigdejiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9689280062; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:24:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Dharmik Thakkar , honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, zhongdahulinfan@163.com Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 21:24:05 +0200 Message-ID: <2469312.dFCSdvozyX@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190509171907.14693-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> References: <20190509133924.7153-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> <20190509171907.14693-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] hash: fix bugs in 'free key with position' X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 19:24:08 -0000 09/05/2019 19:19, Dharmik Thakkar: > This patch series solves 2 bugs reported on Bugzilla (bug-261) within > the function rte_hash_free_key_with_postion(). It also adds a test case > to catch similar bugs in the future. > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261 Yipeng, Sameh, should it enter in 19.05-rc4? Are you sure it does not break things more? If yes, please give your ack. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58560A0096 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 21:24:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966995398; Thu, 9 May 2019 21:24:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8F74F91 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 21:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D44823E47; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:24:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 May 2019 15:24:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=kfV2eV3tEZpXnXW+d9S71YJ5OWelCvNI8+Pd+J4T+1Q=; b=NxqD0ox3LYXE VFlb0OLXSXAA5CfJmMyl3+WnxMMb7iM4LRJlUOSnKIhZmOMGXRJF0Jju2y2vj/uQ OKCOVFDFAuL2KN8mFPZjWQ2/G2ttob7ehoSYrEKaUjPgB3LDTZSSijtw+O+yeqL3 9T+ALfbXZpep5TNFidPsNc44Tik8p7E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=kfV2eV3tEZpXnXW+d9S71YJ5OWelCvNI8+Pd+J4T+ 1Q=; b=QhMb8yRIzixDmm0F+HUiLyWcnA2awtURlbSxjvpxC1/QEjvKDEIYtY3im QGNuFZJCnHizUdk4RU7VEqDypwF4HJA7AZ+qzFzNjq/TkzGvuVU0+3fDPAVgHxvQ MUzi4Fs8am36HYk2g/dxm8fM2XlQODg8w0sqq1ykIWDTK+nYoMYQxvDpOBG8JJyF ThI4l4L3Et2dLJzpSUYJtpZtvO7fyrZP/7sVy2s9UwaMqbA78vZY9uTBkaXyM3C2 RfCBsmExtIh6vN7TxQbDLuCTcY6rNBkp4t3mAbHZuqrarHJqDKaowjno9Wg55UtD N0CpN7YxDTDbRjoSPZAJ4lGdhL9ZA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrkeeigdejiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9689280062; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:24:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Dharmik Thakkar , honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, zhongdahulinfan@163.com Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 21:24:05 +0200 Message-ID: <2469312.dFCSdvozyX@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190509171907.14693-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> References: <20190509133924.7153-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> <20190509171907.14693-1-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] hash: fix bugs in 'free key with position' X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190509192405.9anNQgYEhl2gCqmEts05K5o923RG2asffAel7HQE10Y@z> 09/05/2019 19:19, Dharmik Thakkar: > This patch series solves 2 bugs reported on Bugzilla (bug-261) within > the function rte_hash_free_key_with_postion(). It also adds a test case > to catch similar bugs in the future. > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261 Yipeng, Sameh, should it enter in 19.05-rc4? Are you sure it does not break things more? If yes, please give your ack.