From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D771241C2D; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 12:15:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4017410DF; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 12:15:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B30B410DF for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 12:15:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509FC320098E; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 06:15:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Feb 2023 06:15:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1675768505; x= 1675854905; bh=xeVERmbBubtzbL/kvs1Hp740cubs1BeeDVCOj9TBjI0=; b=A kY1JRqjJHldG5EFW14GpEHmW6TSYy341VZT0q0Eb1hGFS6s1/BKYFvoYf74OCm9u /yWpiaKj3CuDYPFsv/KydTqfrWkOiGIteQeyU+7niKtqQ7fZgK3nnFzCfHcBBIjI CePd6AdBN/OcGyPGdkOpIfBlPqbUGv7pQlKJ81M23PgAoMzLte0egT8kazcyl4pU 88wb7b/K+POpR/7yk6wlDDcb587lfMJF3aXY5H2Psh4WSmuhPwQkbbr7tDiRKFXQ 4WqzLFsRzjN7QTIUEiJ0nPf1nboBNwd8TtTM62OgL+uMMPJhBUpwSsLKHe/7f4/V DMefWa/1sxr0bkCJwQ3Qw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1675768505; x= 1675854905; bh=xeVERmbBubtzbL/kvs1Hp740cubs1BeeDVCOj9TBjI0=; b=i OPk3xlp5ZS0iuDm1aZZKoTdoRqK2AxpEl6oQik7qLsRI1yg7S5ORY1rdY0cg31Yq Q0MofpMW/1eI9hZkmMuA7C+vcuKdG6Z31SsoRw2PF00JS4odYtHofv4mKWMlpv3z y3nJIeRCTAJLBGD5LwUzNDHOl7IWQz/N/xQQ2S8yOwI12i2XCfSDXqr/ZIXTU6Nd 66h3sdE8xGfzEfAEmj6dwvgI2G/kptJeqBSooD60bEGj3E0v1I7RlOdUPclQ710B wHybOuroijWGfzoV3zoIx7SZmgMc0Vm7DPvgUoFOvkIjofpYvPn/cadSkBhYDO0l j+7ejSF/mehMRNkUUIndg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudegkedgvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtjeeiieefhedtfffgvdelteeufeefheeujefgueetfedttdei kefgkeduhedtgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 06:15:04 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ruifeng Wang Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com, rbhansali@marvell.com, fengchengwen@huawei.com, dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpm: use SVE for bulk lookup Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 12:15:02 +0100 Message-ID: <2480871.Sgy9Pd6rRy@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20230109092807.2813215-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> References: <20230109092807.2813215-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 09/01/2023 10:28, Ruifeng Wang: > SVE was used for lookupx4 where four entries are looked up at a time. > It is not an ideal case for SVE implementation which does not bound > to vector length. > Changed to use SVE implementation in bulk lookup when the feature is > available. And optimized the SVE implementation. > The lookupx4 sticks to NEON implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang Applied, thanks.