From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0383FA0546; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:11:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0C62C57; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:11:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217502C36; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:11:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D825C00C4; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:11:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:11:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= flXLGHGVSSxxu2rL+b6Mvi/V1qXjuLA/nJ5ZGIpn6EI=; b=PTm+EZnnBczIZl1J xmyEt3cIVi9XMStoR/MZ1P6zHxHul0k800vRpoiQV4pzX/BLTOVFJjpvItNKBi5m pw8lPJ/bWz5Hudl5sQW9tVojRD27AbCBwptms00Zjm4PMLwbBObr4spm9IuQuQsr XNA8FA7cn5nkABCxMNousHdCn8p6crzh+iO0HcST9qXyFiAZp8z7NK7pS8hBwxdR QzfTf3zREJIkNpV9vB1ewhKANoPoFzR7frquwb5M2dU3Syhva/jgafi0ikLBZ4YT bi5WNZ1SH1ApsVbn1nBMyMV9MIuoqtaosqbL+ZG2fvYBKNEy07BukDsw4XuL3USB AzIMBQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=flXLGHGVSSxxu2rL+b6Mvi/V1qXjuLA/nJ5ZGIpn6 EI=; b=YH6rbVG8a7G7zpj1rqvH9LQi1oQbLyEepE9rDg/jW6GTPFY096ZtD8a/2 X1y0lNMrgzFfI4YhFWK0UL0DVd8ShxdS6dQbXpy81Ghmbn8gQLkzGGl2Sj4co8bP PuH0PLkXNv18AMlfleECqiVnNFEKVFclsMHNwd/PyrQGavwJpLip0OtiO96NYuMH QOBr8xJCIHKuy0ge/2P9K0/8zjMbFPeepjztZU19CTMJ+t510DjicKqIqZKjtvtF C/qWSquXhtBaLVYAgvxWYnx9diRMAU4yOI5jSVML22rm0QQyuVd2A1LDiSEWwdnI CZXYBQYx4YAFqEIBGmdTqRpY3Pq6A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrfedvgddugedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BFBE330600B1; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:11:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Arek Kusztal , Akhil Goyal Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "fiona.trahe@intel.com" , techboard@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:11:50 +0200 Message-ID: <2505982.uU9X1ItemK@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200715155043.12476-1-arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] app: add multi process crypto application X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 15/07/2020 20:26, Akhil Goyal: > Hi Arek, > > > > Due to increasing interest in multi process support for crypto PMDs > > new test app can be added so in overview we can say that: > > > > The Multi-process Crypto application is a simple application that > > allows to run crypto related operations in a multiple process environment. It > > builds on the EAL primary/secondary process infrastructure. > > > > v3: > > - split into multiple patches > > - refactored parts of code > > Looking at the comments on this patchset, I believe the app may not > be ready by RC2 which falls at end of this week for crypto tree. > I have not started review of the application yet. > I see it getting deferred for the next release if it is not added in RC3. In general applications are approved by the technical board. This app was not discussed at all. And I think it will be rejected, because I don't see the value of adding a test application just for multi-process usage.