From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE0DA0C45; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:26:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9CA41196; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:26:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9417340141 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:26:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6A35C015E; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 03:26:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Sep 2021 03:26:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= XhuzLj2flkL44I7H4FIDc9pWagqemIuksWJtuX7tHcU=; b=oPdAAq+F+x1jIEbC qYoxUnocj9F4bjmkliSCJcaHekROso6QEFirvr3r37UVBmIXuBh6YA+HX84AyYvO /N9owRgn8UdHkxBZnEVuqL0M0nWBhaG5xoQd+uKY3EGgO0gol+ONEL9guwAYIvQN gKuC3y1y4r8fSOVwdrgJYRf+Z39IQj6JfJDnhpq0v82DD8IpE/+sHnNrciPu9yyQ k3QHhTNwmhEfXM3rBv/B9+BWzeEtYi3E/04RVyltrV2hOg2n+M8FJYrmDNOkhS8M +HnEXBmk97QGYF2Pno8znsGigOd6gPH/L2XV7h1taV8OWJRrQkSimeNMKkYSlCrN xWUHng== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=XhuzLj2flkL44I7H4FIDc9pWagqemIuksWJtuX7tH cU=; b=IDgVhjmm+Kp4BUNAmUy2YXeEf2xPqoSskp1qrlER9bU7WMlPHNp+6oWK7 wAuOm4V2w0DSmmUQ6IcywwUSx98hebIfWrXAQ5Q/IHOCb9bY4eYqQMg8o9RI8RLN mmAFl2D7ZuOWWz/emF4BXGqN/a6hDjgP7Mwnn9HN4NPMzxMkZ1Rpd+YGAdVVKGAS v+YUlO6CrBiTMC0fO3xcxaKkonV/igVE10sN9gCYsBsn0loypGboaZ4z1bOJR8Fj j97oOAifLC9zv3yI8DUjrPkTwozSP5G9wuKNt7UUoflFB9Xzs3ogND9U96iIWkTh RzXyIBA7IGDrJDpm4Z8n+unwHNkbA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeiiedguddugecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeeh teffvdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 03:26:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Honnappa Nagarahalli , Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula , "jerinj@marvell.com" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , David Marchand , Ruifeng Wang , nd Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:26:48 +0200 Message-ID: <2509537.JPC37jZjU7@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <2238146.M0m9Bb0x2j@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Arm roadmap for 21.11 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 22/09/2021 00:54, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > > > 12/09/2021 00:01, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > > > 1) New rte_wait_until_xxx APIs and their use in various libraries > > > > I don't understand what it is referring to. > > Please could you explain? > Currently we have rte_wait_until_equal API. However this API is not applicable in cases which can involve other comparisons? We are trying to define a more generic API. No RFC yet? So no need to add it in the roadmap for 21.11? > > What about the old item "Arm CRC32 in generic API"? > This one is from Marvell [1] > + Pavan from Marvell > > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20200512204015.1963-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com/ Should we keep this item in the roadmap?