From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE50F2C55 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 01:48:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id l68so50100729wml.1 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:48:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hSgTLQeT/7a/nLrAJsiWVBlZwvyc9PBJnuPbsvQFzBQ=; b=qgXwhWCCaWDjnOJ+bs0+kcRmGTntOhtJiBzvo0EMRYF+VTxisodsp3+Wc+8s/gq1GW S3LCQYDlzmWS0yJD/i6qrO9StVWS1cIfr6Cxse0Oa+TSJKp6mX05+uBKdhkMNmma5GwW FyU1t/BsHjTNOP3Ln2QBC2MrMrDbNyb2zqaKnXKkLMHMAZORGKKoD2gl8amzWHjKdEAf PkMXLAfQ99Gtd2d5Yy26rGo2C8vNrJFrm3SV2a+CBheFaffN9yONVsWeDtqnSsh6I/V4 ZR4jDU64T7Eb/nFYQLgC9WLTuqdz8sm2yoK54eMYA+1IdGdeZmE8vWwH4wTPjH+WFihR XGSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hSgTLQeT/7a/nLrAJsiWVBlZwvyc9PBJnuPbsvQFzBQ=; b=N/0Ge1A5RXxtW08ozGmk8vGGbQGKFMccWplgCgEc0F0BEakSHMfaRhg4KWNlBS1QD0 zN3ZmLgrpoyg2JzCk6CasQIIcvLVOoDmonA6R3103DFZL7qpwv0XfSK2mPCYKzaXT/5z kyGOHaHQKGoxp5xDy/ePoK111Gub60AmqJNxz7YwB/wjRggYp0DNZxmCHKrq+pfA7Kk1 VijZyo6oQGnx7VeW54Uat7/KtK9E1hg8Hko5T6f3TxKJhr9XeaOiiW1UPaYcmTgk9ODj sF2GpAg7LKXo6wAgJDV3mF7LzT0qkNIJ2rorJ29fVsgfIQA1qtS3KMIe1Vot0CGoCZLl 90eg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKQzkOIyBvTPGlMkFL7eKA/oQ3MZgISNEJIUqfZvJ5nH2WZyqOaZVGbbRrNwzz822l6 X-Received: by 10.194.216.40 with SMTP id on8mr35306995wjc.40.1457484537723; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (171.36.101.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.101.36.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u202sm21329665wmd.24.2016.03.08.16.48.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:48:57 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Michal Kobylinski Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 01:47:18 +0100 Message-ID: <2520383.DdIHeuE5aH@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1457470648-26415-1-git-send-email-michalx.kobylinski@intel.com> References: <1457470648-26415-1-git-send-email-michalx.kobylinski@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Added a new rte_lpm_config structure for IPv4. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:48:57 -0000 2016-03-08 21:57, Michal Kobylinski: > A new rte_lpm_config structure is used so LPM library will allocate > exactly the amount of memory which is necessary to hold application=E2= =80=99s > rules. Does it depend on "Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4"? I guess one patch is based on the other in your tree. > Michal Kobylinski (2): > lpm: added a new rte_lpm_config structure for ipv4 > examples: update to use new rte_lpm_config structure for ipv4 Please keep in 1 patch to avoid breaking compilation of examples in bet= ween.