From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, aman.deep.singh@intel.com,
andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] ethdev: fix eth device released repeatedly
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:33:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2527815.Doo92MvZa3@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211012113934.23611-1-lihuisong@huawei.com>
12/10/2021 13:39, Huisong Li:
> The rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_remove() will be called to detach an Ethernet
> device when App calls rte_dev_remove() to detach a pci device. In addition,
> the rte_eth_dev_close() can also detach an Ethernet device.
> In secondary process, if App first calls rte_eth_dev_close() and then calls
> rte_dev_remove(), because rte_eth_dev_close() doesn't clear "eth_dev->data"
It would be clearer if you start this sentence with:
"In secondary process, rte_eth_dev_close() doesn't clear eth_dev->data."
Then you can explain that if calling rte_dev_remove() after rte_eth_dev_close(),
etc...
> , the address of the released Ethernet device can still be found by device
> name. As a result, the Ethernet device will be released repeatedly in this
> case. The state of the Ethernet device is equal to RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED after
> calling rte_eth_dev_close(). Use this state to avoid this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> ---
> + /*
> + * In secondary process, if applications first call rte_eth_dev_close()
> + * and then call this interface, because rte_eth_dev_close() doesn't
> + * clear eth_dev->data, the address of the released Ethernet device can
> + * still be found by device name. As a result, the Ethernet device will
> + * be released repeatedly in this case.
> + * The state of the Ethernet device is equal to RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED after
> + * calling rte_eth_dev_close(). Use this state to avoid this problem.
This is a comment for the commit log.
Inside the code, we should be more to the point.
I suggest this comment:
/* A released port can be found by its name in shared memory. */
> + */
> + if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY &&
Better to directly compare with RTE_PROC_SECONDARY
> + eth_dev->state == RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED) {
> + RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(INFO, "The ethdev port has been released.");
Not sure we need any log here.
> + return 0;
> + }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-12 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 12:46 [dpdk-dev] [RFC V1] ethdev: fix the issue that dev uninit may be called twice Huisong Li
2021-08-03 2:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC V2] ethdev: fix issue that dev close in PMD calls twice Huisong Li
2021-08-13 2:11 ` Huisong Li
2021-08-13 6:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-13 8:16 ` Huisong Li
2021-08-18 11:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-19 3:45 ` Huisong Li
2021-08-24 14:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-25 9:53 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-04 1:23 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-18 3:31 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-20 14:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-22 3:31 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-28 7:19 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2021-09-30 10:54 ` Huisong Li
2021-09-30 11:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-08 6:13 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-08-18 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC V1] ethdev: fix the issue that dev uninit may be called twice Singh, Aman Deep
2021-08-24 2:10 ` Huisong Li
2021-10-08 8:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix eth device released repeatedly Huisong Li
2021-10-08 10:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-09 1:29 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-12 11:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " Huisong Li
2021-10-12 15:33 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-10-14 3:50 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-14 12:32 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-14 12:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-15 3:03 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-15 3:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] " Huisong Li
2021-10-19 13:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-21 2:31 ` lihuisong (C)
2021-10-21 2:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4] " Huisong Li
2021-10-21 21:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2527815.Doo92MvZa3@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).