From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFC98D35 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:06:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id p138so264093619wmb.1 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 03:06:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ex/NtWrJtNbrjTYpXkw/RAKcidscuDCj6ZFyEG1y+gA=; b=lEbwS7ymbTHYMGDVXNOXG8kIcoUP3f+GyUPkLLdvc2W+ZDsJCmTbDrMSg9LyL8bS/k WK2sx0bBIHMui5rN59lPWc4qd/sZpFpXFknXZUuGaFQmaZbR4DVXvaLLy+o87L/xgNIP lLzBbrg580crZfSzQrE8trNnXa/mH990qjXyN0mk0Iz+hcjQQmeS6ZJG25LXr/FGyArZ o1ZcTnC2mx/Ehce3aNPiMaVUdzUcm2IbGc0h1BzQ8sdUYxiPzX0fcBT6oqLt73c9RGx4 RmX1OVdu5grHqxVa+g29iPRZteAFnaYlP6pHi/NUIYrs9d+9AFZz2hHJg6dSQX8B04oj cyFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ex/NtWrJtNbrjTYpXkw/RAKcidscuDCj6ZFyEG1y+gA=; b=MKn30rKBxsv/UjCjco2NF8paF0iXS6dTu7E5hB7xQ9JGxkXF/xJ7Kaa28V59iv9BzZ /g3LbMMxUDpeI2T8GlillS0SUyB3YaN6tJbzB+dJTS3sLFfOe8Km3buks2x0AM63YBwS LQd1TqdjORMbT/IffWwjk7bpVzbKH01e5W+HxcWrhTqN6svu2JBRLBavAlTxbXBa4Aux HdT/TG5q5e7YACq3yOiMxR8qU80dyXQOUqHo62eoJBvCCECbRSirCahFp164aWV8DTWR vTel92dG1EQDwdf0FXhMLrSYRHCzggxe4IOJivyG/o4Joo0P72TWlTFj7cD7jQjytzlA CROA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlzTazc1zDt8ZYl61HuhhaQ5CDgcYIoARPTF34vR0Z2MOeiuhPsTNwvA76OoFxQ1C0+ X-Received: by 10.28.19.194 with SMTP id 185mr18282426wmt.51.1475661980767; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 03:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c5sm8070637wjw.29.2016.10.05.03.06.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Oct 2016 03:06:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Karmarkar Suyash Cc: "Sanford, Robert" , dev@dpdk.org, "reshma.pattan@intel.com" Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:06:17 +0200 Message-ID: <2540689.G69qNnUy5g@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2]:rte_timer:timer lag issue correction X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:06:22 -0000 > > For Periodic timers ,if the lag gets introduced, the current code > > added additional delay when the next peridoc timer was initialized > > by not taking into account the delay added, with this fix the code > > would start the next occurrence of timer keeping in account the > > lag added.Corrected the behavior. > > > > Fixes: 9b15ba89 ("timer: use a skip list") > > > > Karmarkar Suyash (1): > > Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash > > Yes, this change makes sense. I ran timer tests and they passed. > > Acked-by: Robert Sanford Applied, thanks