From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6111D11DE for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 15:49:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C707820A9E; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 09:49:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 20 Jan 2018 09:49:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=xbMckJvlrVtCBzNDgt2RiiE935 KCeng6WI8Pzw/8JGU=; b=KWk2tttrmDEH370Qh3cQMVdnPioMJGbbZutpEr/UaF PvheECcA6H3IzaGINDhbogRZavxmpNOwuPhN7snz4snngH2OC++x/ERxMv+2kueb OFf+JDY4zuND18bqT4nxJ0bkLU1Tgfs7KeNhNsEcMp+9DX3OIqxMcW+hXfe2VK0h 4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=xbMckJ vlrVtCBzNDgt2RiiE935KCeng6WI8Pzw/8JGU=; b=Hg6nDCy0gOXZYIVVlAJmSz LM+3sPLHfVpH/NhUMpu4jEC2UPyAdc7uTWOELLobpjr228k/t9krQgFHEifpeiiw gY6K+uXFqoJD5zsPBj6ahzL4oZCflg1NgEgfNKPZ5AYDnLslfE813JeXP1fDPZpV MKQIHOGJ/WkswYWZwOnD2O9XI6tFIgbIFyg1i+5N19L6bfv4nQP9Oc3siFPKqLyh MOBQlKQzg+xetIfwegHDzFHHV9W2rA3rCX4tDAp7BQ9n3hRehQl5YIAInAH8ezmE zDz70Fqrzdc5i6z3efopoqsHOnPjUGQHdwBt5rwcUp72Y9vBzdMPcF9u/rdG1CyA == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7627624636; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 09:49:05 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Maxime Coquelin , Jonas Pfefferle Cc: dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 15:48:30 +0100 Message-ID: <2553597.NGuM8CDarU@xps> In-Reply-To: <8831fc88-0f0d-b89e-5d19-a12983b243cf@redhat.com> References: <1509465586-7436-1-git-send-email-jpf@zurich.ibm.com> <8831fc88-0f0d-b89e-5d19-a12983b243cf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vfio: noiommu check error handling X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 14:49:06 -0000 19/01/2018 18:37, Maxime Coquelin: > > On 10/31/2017 04:59 PM, Jonas Pfefferle wrote: > > Check and report errors on open/read in noiommu check. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Pfefferle > > --- > > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > I agree with the fix, Kernels v4.4 and earlier does have vfio, but not > the noiommu mode, so the file does not exist. > > Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin Applied, and added this explanation, thanks