DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: add asynchronous request API to DPDK IPC
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 09:29:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2563064.olffpIeeN1@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ED26CBA2FAD1BF48A8719AEF02201E36514A9BC0@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

28/03/2018 04:08, Tan, Jianfeng:
> Hi Thomas ,
> 
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > 27/03/2018 15:59, Anatoly Burakov:
> > > Under the hood, we create a separate thread to deal with replies to
> > > asynchronous requests, that will just wait to be notified by the
> > > main thread, or woken up on a timer.
> > 
> > I really don't like that a library is creating a thread.
> > We don't even know where the thread is created (which core).
> > Can it be a rte_service? or in the interrupt thread?
> 
> Agree that we'd better not adding so many threads in a library.
> 
> I was considering to merge all the threads into the interrupt thread, however, we don't have an interrupt thread in freebsd. Further, we don't implement alarm API in freebsd. That's why I tend to current implementation, and optimize it later.

I would prefer we improve the current code now instead of polluting more
with more uncontrolled threads.

> For rte_service, it may be not a good idea to reply on it as it needs explicit API calls to setup.

I don't see the issue of the explicit API.
The IPC is a new service.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-28  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-27 14:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-02-28 10:22 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-02 18:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-03-07 16:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-03-13 17:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-03-23 15:38       ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-23 18:21         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-24 13:22           ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-24 12:46       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] eal: rename IPC sync request to pending request Anatoly Burakov
2018-03-26  7:31         ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-27 13:59         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Anatoly Burakov
2018-03-27 16:27           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-28  9:15             ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-28 10:08               ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-28 10:57                 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-31 17:06           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-03-31 17:06           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] eal: rename mp_request to mp_request_sync Anatoly Burakov
2018-04-02  5:09             ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-31 17:06           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] eal: add asynchronous request API to DPDK IPC Anatoly Burakov
2018-04-04 22:15             ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-27 13:59         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-03-27 16:33           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-28  2:08             ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-28  7:29               ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-03-28  8:22                 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-03-28  8:55                   ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-28  9:10                     ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-03-28  9:21                     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-28  9:53                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-28 10:42                         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-28 11:26                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-28 12:21                             ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-28  9:11                 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-03-24 12:46       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Anatoly Burakov
2018-03-26 14:15         ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-26 14:28           ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-02 18:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2018-03-03 12:29   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-02 18:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-03-03 13:44   ` Burakov, Anatoly

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2563064.olffpIeeN1@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).