From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44891A0032; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:45:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F9E4021D; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:45:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A94940156; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:45:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77F95C0129; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:45:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:45:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1663148750; x= 1663235150; bh=LNCeAaKcdZfZmuMU1mtOMbsDsYnsr3GLbl1S3ZHQKqk=; b=A ZgUC0rfLru7zGvm3WdRLn5EBlS8NJLiwlk+rdGrBWj5QLpSNg+rCDWtI32RRJUg+ 8eROgphY/QvSpDTIMUm7rgqB0n369fuKPTBnwnS1LKPmjla/mHSOzl3zU65bw/Zz xrxGUPodhn8ri/i/qHXIIE6F4VttcxfOf6maSKHf9jeI7Y/rvTMJOAk1COLL+6M0 IYobwCD3aShHOS27QqVzLNAboo3jUtGw4v8dCZJsxrNo2/Qv++RsKZR+2TIf+Iqc 2NxQjTh6PFlW2COHwgFnCEbNZfKMBwKHuXzNn7uZVVDpO73K5Q0t7aFpib9GrKHO uv5Lef83QY1vK3mxGScug== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1663148750; x= 1663235150; bh=LNCeAaKcdZfZmuMU1mtOMbsDsYnsr3GLbl1S3ZHQKqk=; b=w uR3irxcJUC3o/McG26CmROaW25vazOeE9Vuybt7p1xqHZu/ycMAk+qICORp5lEvj LTiRNlRkVISdRgEO1R7SSJg6yjQV2lshhWTmAKELqrcdA9BF72wEdr5MIrz9VWbp UC11s7aELv0Y/cvzLk8M2ZqQhd8EH8RzaJpcO6ULeSYzXYZi8RHSjh9jwgh0oNjt sCqSoiN1X+n9Y3UifVmZ/3fbMOe+/MZjSm7x49z77kmVAnIYoFB4s+O6qIOOhChi xG8voAwSo8Z812SE4CrkmTJBMvP9B1xR+oZomVVrx++trnPIru16h5707iqb3BWG qRx4D+SNvkpdPfILNqaTQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeduiedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtjeeiieefhedtfffgvdelteeufeefheeujefgueetfedttdei kefgkeduhedtgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Xia, Chenbo" , David Marchand , Maxime Coquelin Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: fix vq use after free on NUMA reallocation Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:45:48 +0200 Message-ID: <2571819.k3LOHGUjKi@thomas> In-Reply-To: <4ac23626-27fb-e319-8050-82f504393589@redhat.com> References: <20220722135320.109269-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <2718825.BEx9A2HvPv@thomas> <4ac23626-27fb-e319-8050-82f504393589@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 14/09/2022 11:34, Maxime Coquelin: > > On 9/14/22 11:15, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 14/09/2022 09:14, Maxime Coquelin: > >> On 9/14/22 03:05, Xia, Chenbo wrote: > >>> From: Maxime Coquelin > >>>> On 7/26/22 09:55, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > >>>> The bug this patch is fixing is being reproduced downstream. > >>>> It would be great it gets merged in main branch rapidly so that we can > >>>> perform the backport. > >>>> > >>>> Chenbo, are you planning a pull request for vhost/virtio in the next few > >>>> days? If not, should the main branch maintainer pick this single patch > >>>> directly and let the rest of the series more time for reviews? > >>> > >>> Based on the status of all patches in the list, I guess PR will not happen > >>> this week. So it will be good if David/Thomas can directly pick up this. > >> > >> OK, sounds good to me. > >> > >> Thomas/David, is that good on your side? > > > > Is there a blocker to merge the whole series? > > No, I reviewed the whole series. > > But other patches are an enhancement, so it would not hurt to have more > reviews. > > I am fine either way. I prefer not breaking series. How urgent is it? Should I merge it today?