* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names
@ 2016-09-28 2:54 Liu, Yong
2016-10-10 14:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yong @ 2016-09-28 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reshma.pattan; +Cc: dev
Tested-by: Yong Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
FangFang Wei <fangfangx.wei@intel.com>
- Tested Branch: dpdk/master
- Tested Commit: e22856313fff2db12d8e132dad446bbf74cf29a5
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
- Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration
- Prerequisites:
- Total 1 cases, 1 passed, 0 failed
- Prerequisites command / instruction:
N/A
- Case:
Description: Build test on different distributions
Command / instruction:
Verify build pass on listed distributions.
OS GCC Kernel
Ubuntu 16.04 5.4.0 4.4.0-36-generic
Fedora23 5.3.1 4.2.3-300
Fedora24 6.1.1 4.6.4-301
Ubuntu 12.04 4.6.3 3.8.0-29
Ubuntu 12.04 i686 4.6.3 3.8.0-29
Ubuntu 14.04 4.8.4 3.16.0-30
Ubuntu 14.04 i686 4.8.4 3.16.0-30
Fedora18 4.7.2 3.6.10-4
Fedora18 i686 4.7.2 3.6.10-4
Fedora20 4.8.2 3.15.6-200
Fedora20 i686 4.8.3 3.11.0
Suse11SP2 4.5.1 3.0.13-0.2
Suse12SP3 4.7.2 3.7.10-1.1
RHEL7.0 4.8.2 3.10.0-123
RHEL7.2 4.8.5 3.10.0-327
CentOS7.0 4.8.5 3.10.0-327
FreeBSD10.0 4.8.4 10.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD10.3 4.8.5 10.3-RELEASE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names
2016-09-28 2:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names Liu, Yong
@ 2016-10-10 14:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-10 15:21 ` Pattan, Reshma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2016-10-10 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu, Yong, reshma.pattan; +Cc: dev
2016-09-28 10:54, Liu, Yong:
> Tested-by: Yong Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> FangFang Wei <fangfangx.wei@intel.com>
[...]
> Description: Build test on different distributions
> Command / instruction:
> Verify build pass on listed distributions.
>
> OS GCC Kernel
> Ubuntu 16.04 5.4.0 4.4.0-36-generic
> Fedora23 5.3.1 4.2.3-300
> Fedora24 6.1.1 4.6.4-301
> Ubuntu 12.04 4.6.3 3.8.0-29
> Ubuntu 12.04 i686 4.6.3 3.8.0-29
> Ubuntu 14.04 4.8.4 3.16.0-30
> Ubuntu 14.04 i686 4.8.4 3.16.0-30
> Fedora18 4.7.2 3.6.10-4
> Fedora18 i686 4.7.2 3.6.10-4
> Fedora20 4.8.2 3.15.6-200
> Fedora20 i686 4.8.3 3.11.0
> Suse11SP2 4.5.1 3.0.13-0.2
> Suse12SP3 4.7.2 3.7.10-1.1
> RHEL7.0 4.8.2 3.10.0-123
> RHEL7.2 4.8.5 3.10.0-327
> CentOS7.0 4.8.5 3.10.0-327
> FreeBSD10.0 4.8.4 10.0-RELEASE
> FreeBSD10.3 4.8.5 10.3-RELEASE
I do not understand this test.
This patch is dropping a lot of optimizations with compilers older than 4.9 !
Why not recommend GCC 4.9 and keep the graceful degradation for older versions,
at least for one more year, even if it is not optimal for newer architectures?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names
2016-10-10 14:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2016-10-10 15:21 ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-10-10 17:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pattan, Reshma @ 2016-10-10 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon, Liu, Yong; +Cc: dev
Hi Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 3:26 PM
> To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Pattan, Reshma
> <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors
> code names
>
> 2016-09-28 10:54, Liu, Yong:
> > Tested-by: Yong Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> > FangFang Wei <fangfangx.wei@intel.com>
> [...]
> > Description: Build test on different distributions
> > Command / instruction:
> > Verify build pass on listed distributions.
> >
> > OS GCC Kernel
> > Ubuntu 16.04 5.4.0 4.4.0-36-generic
> > Fedora23 5.3.1 4.2.3-300
> > Fedora24 6.1.1 4.6.4-301
> > Ubuntu 12.04 4.6.3 3.8.0-29
> > Ubuntu 12.04 i686 4.6.3 3.8.0-29
> > Ubuntu 14.04 4.8.4 3.16.0-30
> > Ubuntu 14.04 i686 4.8.4 3.16.0-30
> > Fedora18 4.7.2 3.6.10-4
> > Fedora18 i686 4.7.2 3.6.10-4
> > Fedora20 4.8.2 3.15.6-200
> > Fedora20 i686 4.8.3 3.11.0
> > Suse11SP2 4.5.1 3.0.13-0.2
> > Suse12SP3 4.7.2 3.7.10-1.1
> > RHEL7.0 4.8.2 3.10.0-123
> > RHEL7.2 4.8.5 3.10.0-327
> > CentOS7.0 4.8.5 3.10.0-327
> > FreeBSD10.0 4.8.4 10.0-RELEASE
> > FreeBSD10.3 4.8.5 10.3-RELEASE
>
> I do not understand this test.
> This patch is dropping a lot of optimizations with compilers older than 4.9 !
>
> Why not recommend GCC 4.9 and keep the graceful degradation for older
> versions, at least for one more year, even if it is not optimal for newer
> architectures?
I am ok with the idea, so should I send latest patch by keeping the code in mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk untouched/intact?
Thanks,
Reshma
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names
2016-10-10 15:21 ` Pattan, Reshma
@ 2016-10-10 17:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2016-10-10 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pattan, Reshma; +Cc: Liu, Yong, dev
2016-10-10 15:21, Pattan, Reshma:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Why not recommend GCC 4.9 and keep the graceful degradation for older
> > versions, at least for one more year, even if it is not optimal for newer
> > architectures?
>
> I am ok with the idea, so should I send latest patch by keeping the code in
> mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk untouched/intact?
Yes please.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names
2016-08-22 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Reshma Pattan
@ 2016-09-02 14:17 ` Pattan, Reshma
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pattan, Reshma @ 2016-09-02 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi,
Gentle remainder for review.
Thanks,
Reshma
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names
2016-08-15 15:02 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Reshma Pattan
@ 2016-08-22 14:19 ` Reshma Pattan
2016-09-02 14:17 ` Pattan, Reshma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Reshma Pattan @ 2016-08-22 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Reshma Pattan
The GCC 4.9 -march option supports the intel code names for processors,
for example -march=silvermont, -march=broadwell.
The RTE_MACHINE config flag can be used to pass code name to
the compiler as -march flag. Also old gcc versions compatibility code
for the intel platform is removed from
mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk
Release notes is updated.
Linux and FreeBSD getting started guides are updated with recommended
gcc version as 4.9 and above.
Some of the gmake command examples in sample application guide and driver
guides are updated with gcc version as 4.9.
Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
---
doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_dpdk.rst | 4 +--
doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_sample_apps.rst | 6 ++--
doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst | 6 ++--
doc/guides/nics/bnx2x.rst | 4 +--
doc/guides/nics/qede.rst | 2 +-
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst | 5 +++
mk/target/generic/rte.vars.mk | 4 +++
mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk | 47 ++--------------------------
8 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
v2:
Updated Linux and FreeBSD gsg guides, sample application guide and other driver doc
with recommended gcc version as 4.9 and above.
diff --git a/doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_dpdk.rst b/doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_dpdk.rst
index 93c4366..7d5e9dc 100644
--- a/doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_dpdk.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_dpdk.rst
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ The ports required and their locations are as follows:
For compiling and using the DPDK with gcc, the compiler must be installed
from the ports collection:
-* gcc: version 4.8 is recommended ``/usr/ports/lang/gcc48``.
+* gcc: version 4.9 is recommended ``/usr/ports/lang/gcc49``.
Ensure that ``CPU_OPTS`` is selected (default is OFF).
When running the make config-recursive command, a dialog may be presented to the
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ For example to compile for FreeBSD use:
If the compiler binary to be used does not correspond to that given in the
TOOLCHAIN part of the target, the compiler command may need to be explicitly
specified. For example, if compiling for gcc, where the gcc binary is called
- gcc4.8, the command would need to be ``gmake install T=<target> CC=gcc4.8``.
+ gcc4.9, the command would need to be ``gmake install T=<target> CC=gcc4.9``.
Browsing the Installed DPDK Environment Target
----------------------------------------------
diff --git a/doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_sample_apps.rst b/doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_sample_apps.rst
index 2662303..fffc4c0 100644
--- a/doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_sample_apps.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/freebsd_gsg/build_sample_apps.rst
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ the following variables must be exported:
The following is an example of creating the ``helloworld`` application, which runs
in the DPDK FreeBSD environment. While the example demonstrates compiling
-using gcc version 4.8, compiling with clang will be similar, except that the ``CC=``
+using gcc version 4.9, compiling with clang will be similar, except that the ``CC=``
parameter can probably be omitted. The ``helloworld`` example may be found in the
``${RTE_SDK}/examples`` directory.
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ in the build directory.
setenv RTE_SDK $HOME/DPDK
setenv RTE_TARGET x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc
- gmake CC=gcc48
+ gmake CC=gcc49
CC main.o
LD helloworld
INSTALL-APP helloworld
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ in the build directory.
cd my_rte_app/
setenv RTE_TARGET x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc
- gmake CC=gcc48
+ gmake CC=gcc49
CC main.o
LD helloworld
INSTALL-APP helloworld
diff --git a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst
index b321544..3d74342 100644
--- a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.rst
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ Compilation of the DPDK
* coreutils: ``cmp``, ``sed``, ``grep``, ``arch``, etc.
-* gcc: versions 4.5.x or later is recommended for ``i686/x86_64``. Versions 4.8.x or later is recommended
- for ``ppc_64`` and ``x86_x32`` ABI. On some distributions, some specific compiler flags and linker flags are enabled by
+* gcc: versions 4.9 or later is recommended for all platforms.
+ On some distributions, some specific compiler flags and linker flags are enabled by
default and affect performance (``-fstack-protector``, for example). Please refer to the documentation
of your distribution and to ``gcc -dumpspecs``.
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Compilation of the DPDK
.. note::
x86_x32 ABI is currently supported with distribution packages only on Ubuntu
- higher than 13.10 or recent Debian distribution. The only supported compiler is gcc 4.8+.
+ higher than 13.10 or recent Debian distribution. The only supported compiler is gcc 4.9+.
.. note::
diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/bnx2x.rst b/doc/guides/nics/bnx2x.rst
index 6453168..6d1768a 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/bnx2x.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/bnx2x.rst
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ To compile BNX2X PMD for FreeBSD x86_64 gcc target, run the following "gmake"
command::
cd <DPDK-source-directory>
- gmake config T=x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc install -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc48 CC=gcc48
+ gmake config T=x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc install -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 CC=gcc49
To compile BNX2X PMD for FreeBSD x86_64 gcc target, run the following "gmake"
command:
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ command:
.. code-block:: console
cd <DPDK-source-directory>
- gmake config T=x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc install -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc48 CC=gcc48
+ gmake config T=x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc install -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 CC=gcc49
Linux
-----
diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/qede.rst b/doc/guides/nics/qede.rst
index 53d749c..3af755e 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/qede.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/qede.rst
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ command::
cd <DPDK-source-directory>
gmake config T=x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc install -Wl,-rpath=\
- /usr/local/lib/gcc48 CC=gcc48
+ /usr/local/lib/gcc49 CC=gcc49
Sample Application Notes
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst
index 0b9022d..9f58133 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst
@@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ New Features
This section is a comment. Make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
+* **Added support for new gcc -march option.**
+
+ The GCC 4.9 ``-march`` option supports the Intel processor code names.
+ The config option ``RTE_MACHINE`` can be used to pass code names to the compiler as ``-march`` flag.
+
Resolved Issues
---------------
diff --git a/mk/target/generic/rte.vars.mk b/mk/target/generic/rte.vars.mk
index 75a616a..b31e426 100644
--- a/mk/target/generic/rte.vars.mk
+++ b/mk/target/generic/rte.vars.mk
@@ -50,7 +50,11 @@
# - can define CPU_ASFLAGS variable (overriden by cmdline value) that
# overrides the one defined in arch.
#
+ifneq ($(wildcard $(RTE_SDK)/mk/machine/$(RTE_MACHINE)/rte.vars.mk),)
include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/machine/$(RTE_MACHINE)/rte.vars.mk
+else
+MACHINE_CFLAGS := -march=$(RTE_MACHINE)
+endif
#
# arch:
diff --git a/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk b/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk
index 6eed20c..7f23721 100644
--- a/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk
+++ b/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk
@@ -42,51 +42,8 @@ GCC_MAJOR = $(shell echo __GNUC__ | $(CC) -E -x c - | tail -n 1)
GCC_MINOR = $(shell echo __GNUC_MINOR__ | $(CC) -E -x c - | tail -n 1)
GCC_VERSION = $(GCC_MAJOR)$(GCC_MINOR)
-# if GCC is older than 4.x
-ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -lt 40 && echo 1), 1)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS =
-$(warning You are using GCC < 4.x. This is neither supported, nor tested.)
-
-
-else
-# GCC graceful degradation
-# GCC 4.2.x - added support for generic target
-# GCC 4.3.x - added support for core2, ssse3, sse4.1, sse4.2
-# GCC 4.4.x - added support for avx, aes, pclmul
-# GCC 4.5.x - added support for atom
-# GCC 4.6.x - added support for corei7, corei7-avx
-# GCC 4.7.x - added support for fsgsbase, rdrnd, f16c, core-avx-i, core-avx2
# GCC 4.9.x - added support for armv8-a+crc
#
- ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -le 49 && echo 1), 1)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -march=armv8-a+crc,-march=armv8-a+crc -D__ARM_FEATURE_CRC32=1,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- endif
- ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -le 47 && echo 1), 1)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -march=core-avx-i,-march=corei7-avx,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -march=core-avx2,-march=core-avx2,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- endif
- ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -lt 46 && echo 1), 1)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -march=corei7-avx,-march=core2 -maes -mpclmul -mavx,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -march=corei7,-march=core2 -maes -mpclmul,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- endif
- ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -lt 45 && echo 1), 1)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -march=atom,-march=core2 -mssse3,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- endif
- ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -lt 44 && echo 1), 1)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(filter-out -mavx -mpclmul -maes,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- ifneq ($(findstring SSE4_2, $(CPUFLAGS)),)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS += -msse4.2
- endif
- ifneq ($(findstring SSE4_1, $(CPUFLAGS)),)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS += -msse4.1
- endif
- endif
- ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -lt 43 && echo 1), 1)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(filter-out -msse% -mssse%,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -march=core2,-march=generic,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- MACHINE_CFLAGS += -msse3
- endif
- ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -lt 42 && echo 1), 1)
- MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(filter-out -march% -mtune% -msse%,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
- endif
+ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -le 49 && echo 1), 1)
+MACHINE_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -march=armv8-a+crc,-march=armv8-a+crc -D__ARM_FEATURE_CRC32=1,$(MACHINE_CFLAGS))
endif
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-10 17:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-28 2:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names Liu, Yong
2016-10-10 14:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-10 15:21 ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-10-10 17:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-15 15:02 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Reshma Pattan
2016-08-22 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Reshma Pattan
2016-09-02 14:17 ` Pattan, Reshma
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).