From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FA995DE for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:41:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so36151325wmw.1 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:41:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=aAtI+uMLnpJSpWDHPRtAH37SxCMfdc2UjMVDobIlw9Y=; b=SWchQMLnU/CaYRxh6CQ0R9JAQ/2hKr8nrZiazVa8L9YL4SugEK86DqoLFnsrdaQTBh tixobMQ3JMaQUT6mF95zERzP9f+TJhmr3EPr7+2y1hNxhYFQzmv0njlHF6oCUmrUUmFm ip/jofkH95ceNRSb0pohdGiQ6bwjWThOQcB9HXS40xGpPHDwv9mhPa2XT0jLUxK8JDSd /wuUnmXF9Xzz++rBvdPxrij6FaXVktl5ZRsS2+WvtKHhauyHJGIln350/vARM9WJB5eM XsRjdDmnijcqN5BlLGVtU6xAu6O1xjyntQ6UGrIQ+JErRGbWnQqLS/1DygsU8pfa660C 0TSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=aAtI+uMLnpJSpWDHPRtAH37SxCMfdc2UjMVDobIlw9Y=; b=NaK4bZMPzORrQvh/isHD8Vzd+7x2utth/6AhxHwBA8TlU18yfiP1XM+AT6YS8lrPkP PjAionR0tfo3DVxpJ1PqqZeFAcq+9zQ8TwjMhzfsj8Enc+v0IpL/3Csu1+ORtG4CjMIE crze0EmlZhRtc1Yw1969EM9WObEXxEtQVkqiZTepzQbUM3tY7LPlxKckHnEWlkACBd6w ioQLFv0XXospcUI9ALwkHs2uYMLjKYpsGykh1kvtTfDwVFzmTU0X7NfIfoEFgUQWTpCg Dg44h3Ex3LOlkUDzbtWji4FL1vpop4bp1tRbATdGGiQeeues0mmm5HiZs4Nmmk0VsPS8 /sRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqr6MJkWYxt1oZvkrTVBKvgeJ5JuU3fcajf0hRFyHFr/yDfTsNnKsqSS450I/WCZWjOdIu X-Received: by 10.28.87.72 with SMTP id l69mr4670898wmb.70.1447432903630; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:41:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm8931705wjs.36.2015.11.13.08.41.42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:41:43 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Aws Ismail Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:40:30 +0100 Message-ID: <2584503.Vl16qpNLEm@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] support for X552/X557-AT 10GBase-T devices X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:41:43 -0000 2015-11-13 11:32, Aws Ismail: > I just wanted to confirm whether the 0x15ad X552/X557-AT 10GBase-T > devices are currently "fully" supported by DPDK (master). My understanding is that it is supported: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=2e83c81bad (but you can have a hint in the last letters of the commit id ;) > I have looked at the ixgbe PMD code and I can see 0x15AD being > mentioned in the device list but I am unable to fully use it even with > the testpmd app. So I think you can send a bug report on this list. > I understand that the 0x15ad devices are not yet fully supported in > the mainline kernel (even in 4.3.x) as of yet, but I wonder if the PMD > usually lags behind the mainline driver. There is no rule and really often they are not written by the same developpers.