From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "pbhagavatula@marvell.com" <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
"Kovacevic, Marko" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [patch v3] doc: announce API change in ethdev offload flags
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:23:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580168A63989@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190808085859.796-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
Hi guys,
>
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>
> Add new offload flags ``DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_PTYPE``, ``DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS``
> and ``DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_FLOW_MARK``.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> ---
> v3 Changes:
> - DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS -> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH (anndrew).
>
> v2 Changes:
> - Reword for clarity.
>
> doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 37b8592b6..056c5709f 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -78,3 +78,16 @@ Deprecation Notices
> to set new power environment if power environment was already initialized.
> In this case the function will return -1 unless the environment is unset first
> (using ``rte_power_unset_env``). Other function usage scenarios will not change.
> +
> +* ethdev: New offload flags ``DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_PTYPE``, ``DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH``
> + and ``DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_FLOW_MARK`` will be added in 19.11.
One question about DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_PTYPE:
Does it mean that new ol_flags value (PKT_RX_PTYPE) will be introduced to
indicate that mbuf.packet_type value is set?
Or PMD will have to set mbuf.packet_type to zero,
when DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_PTYPE was not enabled by user?
If so, what is the advantage?
Again in that case, would it be more plausible to introduce something like:
rte_eth_dev_set_supported_ptypes(uint16_t port_id, uint32_t ptype_mask);
instead of DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_PTYPE?
Konstantin
> + This will allow application to enable or disable PMDs from updating
> + ``rte_mbuf`` fields ``rte_mbuf::packet_type``, ``rte_mbuf::hash::rss`` and
> + ``rte_mbuf::hash::fdir`` respectively.
> + This scheme will allow PMDs to avoid writes to ``rte_mbuf`` fields on Rx and
> + thereby improve Rx performance if application wishes do so.
> + In 19.11 PMDs will still update the fields even when the offloads are not
> + enabled.
> + The exact semantics of the flags will be worked out later either by making
> + them negative offloads to avoid application change or positive offload to
> + align with existing offload flag semantics.
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-08 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 16:09 [dpdk-dev] [patch] " pbhagavatula
2019-08-07 19:36 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-08-08 8:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [patch v2] " pbhagavatula
2019-08-08 8:33 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-08-08 8:55 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-08-08 8:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [patch v3] " pbhagavatula
2019-08-08 9:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-08-08 10:00 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-08-08 10:08 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-08 10:23 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-08-08 10:33 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-08 10:59 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-08-08 11:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-08 16:53 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-09 3:48 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-08-09 8:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-09 8:13 ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-08-09 8:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [patch v4] " pbhagavatula
2019-08-09 8:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-09 9:07 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-08-09 9:13 ` Tom Barbette
2019-08-09 9:22 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-08-09 9:28 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-08-09 9:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [patch v5] " pbhagavatula
2019-08-09 10:13 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-08-10 21:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580168A63989@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).