DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: "stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	"mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] mbuf: add bulk free function
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 09:32:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580191974244@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191007101427.16191-2-mb@smartsharesystems.com>


> 
> Add function for freeing a bulk of mbufs.
> 
> v4:
> * Marked as experimental by adding __rte_experimental.
> * Add function to experimental section of map file.
> * Fix source code formatting regarding pointer to pointer.
> * Squashed multiple modifications into one.
> v3:
> * Bugfix: Handle pakets with multiple segments.
> * Added inline helper function, mainly for readability.
> * Fix source code formatting regarding indentation.
> v2:
> * Function is not inline.
> * Optimized to free multible mbufs belonging to the same mempool in
> bulk. Inspired by ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(), but allowing NULL pointers
> in the array, just like rte_pktmbuf_free() can take a NULL pointer.
> * Use unsigned int instead of unsigned. Passes checkpatch, but
> mismatches the original coding style of the modified files.
> * Fixed a typo in the description headline: mempools is plural.

LGTM, one suggestion see below.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c           | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h           | 12 +++++++
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> index 37718d49c..0088117a3 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> @@ -245,6 +245,56 @@ int rte_mbuf_check(const struct rte_mbuf *m, int is_header,
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * Size of the array holding mbufs from the same membool to be freed in bulk.
> + */
> +#define RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_BULK_SZ 64
> +
> +/**
> + * @internal helper function for freeing a bulk of mbufs via an array holding
> + * mbufs from the same mempool.
> + */
> +static __rte_always_inline void
> +rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(struct rte_mbuf *m,
> +	struct rte_mbuf ** const free, unsigned int * const nb_free)
> +{
> +	m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(m);
> +	if (likely(m != NULL)) {
> +		if (*nb_free >= RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_BULK_SZ ||

Instead of assuming DIM(free) == RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_BULK_SZ,
probably better to pass it as extra parameter to that function:

rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(struct rte_mbuf *m,
	struct rte_mbuf ** const free, unsigned int * const nb_free, uinsigned int max_free)
{
    ...
    if (*nb_free >= max_free || ...

As this routine is 'static inline' and rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk() uses
fixed size array for free[], compiler would be able to figure out
that it is a constant value here anyway.



> +		    (*nb_free > 0 && m->pool != free[0]->pool)) {
> +			rte_mempool_put_bulk(free[0]->pool, (void **)free,
> +					     *nb_free);
> +			*nb_free = 0;
> +		}
> +
> +		free[(*nb_free)++] = m;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/* Free a bulk of mbufs back into their original mempools. */
> +void rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned int count)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mbuf *m, *m_next, *free[RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_BULK_SZ];
> +	unsigned int idx, nb_free = 0;
> +
> +	for (idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) {
> +		m = mbufs[idx];
> +		if (unlikely(m == NULL))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		__rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 1);
> +
> +		do {
> +			m_next = m->next;
> +			rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(m, free, &nb_free);
> +			m = m_next;
> +		} while (m != NULL);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (nb_free > 0)
> +		rte_mempool_put_bulk(free[0]->pool, (void **)free, nb_free);
> +}
> +
>  /* dump a mbuf on console */
>  void
>  rte_pktmbuf_dump(FILE *f, const struct rte_mbuf *m, unsigned dump_len)
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> index 98225ec80..871145796 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> @@ -1907,6 +1907,18 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_free(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>  	}
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * Free a bulk of mbufs back into their original mempools.
> + *
> + *  @param mbufs
> + *    Array of pointers to mbufs.
> + *    The array may contain NULL pointers.
> + *  @param count
> + *    Array size.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +void rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned int count);
> +
>  /**
>   * Creates a "clone" of the given packet mbuf.
>   *
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map
> index 2662a37bf..cd6154ef2 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map
> @@ -50,4 +50,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>  	global:
> 
>  	rte_mbuf_check;
> +	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk;
>  } DPDK_18.08;
> --
> 2.17.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-07 10:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/1] " Morten Brørup
2019-10-07 10:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] " Morten Brørup
2019-10-08 17:25   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-08 20:12     ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-09  6:46       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-09  9:32   ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580191974244@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).