Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default

["Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>]

> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact
> > > > > user
> > > > experience
> > > > > on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to
> > > customers.
> > > > >
> > > > > IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality
> > > > > added every
> > > > release.
> > > > > Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change.
> > > >
> > > > What can be changed in the library to make it acceptable as a default
> > > > in this example?
> > > >
> > >
> > > We are observing performance issues with ipsec library. So would request
> > > other Vendors to confirm if they are OK with the performance numbers.
> >
> > Could you give some details on the performance issues you are seeing.
> >
> 
> We were observing about 4-5% drop when using the ipsec-lib instead of the
> Legacy code path. We would again measure it on RC1. 

Yeh, I remember you already mentioned that few months ago...
Though we don't have access to NXP HW, so obviously we do need
some help from you guys here to address it:
configuration/test details so we can try to reproduce it
probably some insight from you what in particular causing that slowdown..
patches would be even better :)
Konstantin

> That is why I say, I will
> Hold this patch till RC2, unless some other vendor also confirms that.