From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1C8A3168 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BF91E535; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:44:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E74B1D177 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:44:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Oct 2019 03:44:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,303,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="198918968" Received: from irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.28]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2019 03:44:46 -0700 Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.252]) by irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.210]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:44:45 +0100 From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" To: Akhil Goyal , "Iremonger, Bernard" , Thomas Monjalon CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "anoobj@marvell.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default Thread-Index: AQHVeGt1PghzvMyi1UGof2wAAdzVAqdVYHmAgAAtjwCABbfQAIAAJLqAgABntICAAVjjsA== Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:44:45 +0000 Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725801A8C696F5@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1567069173-10505-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1569943080-20228-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <5630388.AILYuOXkcA@xps> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260E0E213@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYTE1ODJhYTAtOWE0My00OTBjLTg3ZjAtZmI1NGY3NmJiMWI0IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiM05kVGxwZUpCMHVpZ212MEN1VFZnMmkwUU9ndGNVczhEMkNKVU55Q1wvazNtM1FKSGZUR3dpYzRrNlFwaDVha2gifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact > > > > > user > > > > experience > > > > > on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to > > > customers. > > > > > > > > > > IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality > > > > > added every > > > > release. > > > > > Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change. > > > > > > > > What can be changed in the library to make it acceptable as a defau= lt > > > > in this example? > > > > > > > > > > We are observing performance issues with ipsec library. So would requ= est > > > other Vendors to confirm if they are OK with the performance numbers. > > > > Could you give some details on the performance issues you are seeing. > > >=20 > We were observing about 4-5% drop when using the ipsec-lib instead of the > Legacy code path. We would again measure it on RC1.=20 Yeh, I remember you already mentioned that few months ago... Though we don't have access to NXP HW, so obviously we do need some help from you guys here to address it: configuration/test details so we can try to reproduce it probably some insight from you what in particular causing that slowdown.. patches would be even better :) Konstantin > That is why I say, I will > Hold this patch till RC2, unless some other vendor also confirms that.