DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] security: add anti replay window size
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:00:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725801A8C701D1@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191025062021.18052-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>

Hi Hemant,

> 
> At present the ipsec xfrom is missing the important step
> to configure the anti replay window size.
> The newly added field will also help in to enable or disable
> the anti replay checking, if available in offload by means
> of non-zero or zero value.

+1 for those changes.
Though AFAIK, it will be an ABI breakage, right?
So probably deserves changes in release notes.

> 
> Currently similar field is available in rte_ipsec lib for
> software ipsec usage. 

Yep, the only thing why it was put here - to avoid ABI breakage
within rte_security.
Having it in the rte_security_ipsec_xform makes much more sense. 

>The newly introduced filed can replace
> that field as well eventually.

My suggestion would be to update librte_ipsec as part of these
patch series.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_security/rte_security.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h
> index aaafdfcd7..195ad5645 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h
> @@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ struct rte_security_ipsec_xform {
>  	/**< Tunnel parameters, NULL for transport mode */
>  	uint64_t esn_soft_limit;
>  	/**< ESN for which the overflow event need to be raised */
> +	uint32_t replay_win_sz;
> +	/**< Anti replay window size to enable sequence replay attack handling.
> +	 * replay checking is disabled if the window size is 0.
> +	 */
>  };





  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-25 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-25  6:20 Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-25  6:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add support for replay win for lookaside Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-25 10:00 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-10-25 15:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] security: add anti replay window size Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-30  6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-30  6:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ipsec: remove redundant replay_win_sz Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-30  8:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] security: add anti replay window size Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-30  8:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ipsec: remove redundant replay_win_sz Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-30 13:08       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-31  4:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] security: add anti replay window size Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-31  4:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ipsec: remove redundant replay_win_sz Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-31 10:21         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-31  4:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] crypto/dpaa2_sec: enable anti replay window config Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-31  6:29       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] security: add anti replay window size Anoob Joseph
2019-10-31  7:30         ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-31 10:20       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-31 13:15       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-31 13:15         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] ipsec: remove redundant replay_win_sz Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-05 22:01           ` Akhil Goyal
2019-11-06  5:16             ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-31 13:15         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] crypto/dpaa2_sec: enable anti replay window config Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-05 22:07           ` Akhil Goyal
2019-11-06  5:16             ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-01  6:16         ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v5 1/3] security: add anti replay window size Anoob Joseph
2019-11-01  9:48           ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-06  6:54         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-06  6:54           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] ipsec: remove redundant replay_win_sz Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-06  7:00             ` Akhil Goyal
2019-11-06 13:31             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-11-06 13:40               ` Akhil Goyal
2019-11-06 14:27                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-11-06 14:29                   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-11-06  6:54           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] crypto/dpaa2_sec: enable anti replay window config Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-06  7:02             ` Akhil Goyal
2019-11-06 13:15           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] security: add anti replay window size Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725801A8C701D1@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).