From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Kulasek, TomaszX" <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: fix segfault with gcc 5.x
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:34:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B2DF1A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459781123-7556-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
Hi Tomasz,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz Kulasek
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 3:45 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: fix segfault with gcc 5.x
>
> It seems that with gcc >5.x and -O2/-O3 optimization breaks packet grouping
> algorithm.
>
> When last packet pointer "lp" and "pnum->u64" buffer points the same
> memory buffer, high optimization can cause unpredictable results. It seems
> that assignment of precalculated group sizes may interfere with
> initialization of new group size when lp points value inside current group
> and didn't should be changed.
>
> With gcc >5.x and optimization we cannot be sure which assignment will be
> done first, so the group size can be counted incorrectly.
>
> This patch eliminates intersection of assignment of initial group size
> (lp[0] = 1) and precalculated group sizes when gptbl[v].idx < 4.
>
> Fixes: 94c54b4158d5 ("examples/l3fwd: rework exact-match")
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
> ---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h
> index f9cf50a..1afa1f0 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h
> @@ -283,9 +283,9 @@ port_groupx4(uint16_t pn[FWDSTEP + 1], uint16_t *lp, __m128i dp1, __m128i dp2)
>
> /* if dest port value has changed. */
> if (v != GRPMSK) {
> - lp = pnum->u16 + gptbl[v].idx;
> - lp[0] = 1;
> pnum->u64 = gptbl[v].pnum;
> + pnum->u16[FWDSTEP] = 1;
Hmm, but FWDSTEP and gptbl[v].idx are not always equal.
Actually could you explain a bit more - what exactly is reordered by gcc 5.x,
and how to reproduce it?
i.e what sequence of input packets will trigger an error?
Konstantin
> + lp = pnum->u16 + gptbl[v].idx;
> }
>
> return lp;
> --
> 1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-04 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-04 14:45 Tomasz Kulasek
2016-04-04 15:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2016-04-04 15:51 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-04 16:20 ` Kulasek, TomaszX
2016-04-04 19:05 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-04-05 12:02 ` Kulasek, TomaszX
2016-04-04 19:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-04-06 9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B2DF1A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).