DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>, "Yao, Lei A" <lei.a.yao@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: enable i40e pmd on ARM platform
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 08:29:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B8D25C@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP4Qi39C0vNSbkOaVapiSGBbt=em7kef9XLP-W3UjDjKMWoTCg@mail.gmail.com>


Hi Jianbo,

> > Hi, Jianbo
> >
> > I have tested you patch on my X86 platform,  the single core performance for Non-vector PMD will have about 1Mpps drop
> > Non-vector PMD single core performance with patch               :  ~33.9 Mpps
> > Non-vector PMD single core performance without patch        :  ~35.1 Mpps
> > Is there any way to avoid such performance drop on X86? Thanks.
> >
> 
> I think we can place a compiling condition before rte_rmb() to avoid performance decrease on x86.
> For example:  #if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)

I suppose you can use rte_smp_rmb() here?
Konstantin

> 
> Thanks!
> Jianbo
> 
> > BRs
> > Lei
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jianbo Liu
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 2:58 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> > <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: enable i40e pmd on ARM platform
> >
> > And add read memory barrier to avoid status inconsistency between two RX descriptors readings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc | 2 +-
> >  doc/guides/nics/overview.rst               | 2 +-
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c               | 2 ++
> >  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc
> > b/config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc
> > index 1a17126..08f282b 100644
> > --- a/config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc
> > +++ b/config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc
> > @@ -46,6 +46,6 @@ CONFIG_RTE_EAL_IGB_UIO=n
> >
> >  CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IVSHMEM=n
> >  CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_FM10K_PMD=n
> > -CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_PMD=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_INC_VECTOR=n
> >
> >  CONFIG_RTE_SCHED_VECTOR=n
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/overview.rst
> > b/doc/guides/nics/overview.rst index 6abbae6..5175591 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/nics/overview.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/nics/overview.rst
> > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ Most of these differences are summarized below.
> >     Linux VFIO                     Y Y   Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y                     Y   Y Y
> >     Other kdrv                                                         Y Y               Y
> >     ARMv7                                                                        Y             Y Y
> > -   ARMv8                                              Y Y Y Y                   Y         Y   Y Y
> > +   ARMv8                                  Y           Y Y Y Y                   Y         Y   Y Y
> >     Power8                                                             Y Y       Y
> >     TILE-Gx                                                                      Y
> >     x86-32                         Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y       Y           Y Y Y
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index 554d167..4004b8e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > @@ -994,6 +994,8 @@ i40e_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
> >                                         I40E_RXD_QW1_STATUS_SHIFT;
> >                 }
> >
> > +               rte_rmb();
> > +
> >                 /* Compute how many status bits were set */
> >                 for (j = 0, nb_dd = 0; j < I40E_LOOK_AHEAD; j++)
> >                         nb_dd += s[j] & (1 <<
> > I40E_RX_DESC_STATUS_DD_SHIFT);
> > --
> > 2.4.11
> >

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-03  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-02  6:58 Jianbo Liu
     [not found] ` <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E0330A4B6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-08-03  3:26   ` Yao, Lei A
2016-08-03  6:02     ` Jianbo Liu
2016-08-03  7:58       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-08-03  9:33         ` Jianbo Liu
2016-08-03  8:29       ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2016-08-03  9:36         ` Jianbo Liu
2016-08-03 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jianbo Liu
2016-08-05  9:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jianbo Liu
2016-09-23  1:13   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2016-09-27 13:39     ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B8D25C@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=jianbo.liu@linaro.org \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=lei.a.yao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).